The Family Planning Commission carried out interventions for abortion among unmarried people.
Today's headlines exploded: the Family Planning Commission launched an intervention for abortions among unmarried people.
It seems that the State Family Planning Commission is also a headache for the population problem, but it cannot solve the essential problems of high living costs such as education and housing, and the population problem cannot be better solved.
[Image]
I don't know how everyone feels, I saw the first feeling that I should not do a good job of preventive measures to guide, rather than intervention, how to intervene in this kind of thing? Persuade her to be born? So who feeds this child? Who is responsible for this child? If a life is hastily brought into this world, it is even more irresponsible to him. We often say that it is easy to have children and difficult to raise, and it takes at least eighteen years to have a child in October, which takes a lot more time and energy than having a child. With the development of the times, more and more unmarried pregnancies, some people even miscarry before marriage, resulting in infertility in the later stages, but this group is a minority after all. In the case of so many modern contraceptive methods, normal people should know how to use normal contraception to protect their health. We should better guide young people from the perspective of family and society to have self-esteem and self-love, and do a good job of prevention and education measures.
As far as the national family planning department is concerned, in the case of a sharp decline in the population, if we want to rush to solve this problem, we should work the main problem of why everyone is unwilling to have children, solve the difficulties of the current pregnant population that they are unwilling to have children, and improve everyone's willingness to have children, and the problem of fertility will be alleviated. I remember that in a book called "Late Maturing Times", the concept of a collective parent was proposed. Modern children from birth to adulthood, education, care all rely on parents or grandparents, but when we were young, we raised three or four babies in a family, when a large family lived together, aunts and uncles can help take care of, fathers, mothers go out to work, we can play at home with the children in the community or the village, go to school with the friends to go to school, never parents have picked up. But now after eugenics, urban and rural education is declining, we are all crowded to the city to go to school, the resources in the city are limited, everyone is competing for each other for school districts, children can not go to school nearby Parents pick up and drop off caused traffic congestion, which undoubtedly increases the cost of parenting. For thousands of years, children have grown up in the fields, or grown up with their friends in the alleys of the city, but now children basically grow up in incubators, except for classmates, there are no small partners in the community. In order to avoid accidental risks, the school does not allow children to play and play, and children must sit quietly after class in addition to learning. After class, I will go to various tutoring classes accompanied by my parents. Is such a childhood a childhood?
Although the days are good, but the pressure of life is still relatively large, in the eighties and nineties, parents raise us, just for the children to eat and wear warm ways, because in education are similar, school differences are not big, mainly in the degree of personal effort. But part of the education of modern children is outside the school, parents have to check homework every day, to take their children to a lot of tutoring classes, most of the pressure on parents, you can't afford to buy a school district house, which means that children may not be able to go to school in the school district; you don't have good connections or money, which means you can't go to a better school. The child's future will also be seriously affected by the ability of parents, such anxiety is maintained year after year, coupled with the pressure of the first shake of the small rise, the pressure of the initial rise to school, parents do not want to let the child lose on the starting line, but in fact, most of us are not able to provide a better education for the future of the child.
There is also the over-exaggeration of modern women's workplace status and the weakening of family status. Modern times are everywhere to promote the social status of women, and women in the workplace are even more reluctant to shave their eyebrows. We are basically both parents at work, the children are either managed by the elderly, or no one is in charge, most of the family women have to go to work, because the male salary is not enough to support the whole family, and some even work together as husband and wife, and they are not enough to support the elderly and children. Workplace competition is also becoming more and more fierce, because the number of employees in our country is large, so there can be strict age restrictions when recruiting, and 35+ has become a pain point in the workplace. Many women are unable to complete multiple births because they have to go to work and have children unattended.
Remember there is a sentence, a mother decides the three generations of a family, good education mainly comes from mothers, full-time mothers are also a job, the state should encourage full-time mothers, women in the workplace to shine, and dedication in the family is just as important, even more important than in the workplace. To improve the security of full-time mothers, women should be encouraged to be full-time before the child is three years old, and a certain living subsidy should be given to full-time mothers, so that more jobs will be left, so that the positions competed by vicious talents will increase wages, so that fathers can support the family with a salary.
