In 2021, ancient tombs have been found again in South Chungcheong Province, South Korea, and archaeologists are trembling: it will not be related to China again! As a result, the tomb brick is impressively inscribed: This is the jianye man who built it!
This ancient tomb is located near the Tomb of King Wuning in Gongju, Chungcheongnam-do, and must have been a funerary tomb for members of the royal family at that time. The ancient burial system was very strict, and the culture and burial system of the ancient Korean Peninsula were all from China and were exclusive to the ruling class. Ordinary people dig a pit and bury it. To know that a brick was equivalent to 50 yuan at that time, how much did it cost to build a tomb! Ordinary people can't even eat, and they still buy bricks?
According to experts, the tomb date is 1500 years ago in the Baekje period, that is, the Period of the Southern and Northern Dynasties of China, between 420-589 AD.
Baekje, the old name of the Kingdom of Korea, was a small state founded in ancient China by the Buyeo people living in the northeast to the southwest of the Korean Peninsula. The Buyeo are the ruling class, two distinct ethnic groups from the Koreans in the south of the peninsula.
At the entrance of the ancient tomb, it was found that the side of the tomb brick was engraved with a very beautiful line of Chinese characters: "This is the Jianye people who built this." "There are also lotus patterns on the tomb tiles, which proves that the level of the tomb owner is very high, not ordinary people."
Jianye is the old name of Nanjing.
Originally jianye, it originated from the Three Kingdoms period in 221 AD, when it belonged to Eastern Wu, and in 229 AD, Eastern Wu built its capital here and changed its name to Jianye.
The Korean Archaeological Research Institute believes that this can only show that the craftsmen who made the tomb bricks are from China, and it cannot be proved that the tomb was also built Chinese.
This only shows that he does not know much about Chinese culture, or lacks knowledge of the construction of ancient tombs in China.
You know, this line appears at the entrance of the tomb, which proves that the tomb was also built or supervised by the "Builder".
If it is only marked that the tomb brick was burned by him, why does this line happen to appear at the entrance of the tomb? And not appear elsewhere.
Moreover, the strokes of this line are very thin, and at a glance, it is known that it is carved with a sharp object.
Ancient Chinese craftsmen worked for the public, most of them left their names, in case something went wrong, so that they could find the person responsible. For example, the bricks used to burn the city wall will engrave my name on the brick mold.
But this is a tomb brick, it will certainly not be engraved on the mold, there is no need to leave a name, buried in the ground even if there is a quality problem you can not see ah. And it is not auspicious to keep a person's name, which is not equivalent to burying yourself.
On all the tomb tiles, at most, there is a pattern, and the pattern is molded, and each piece is the same. There are patterns on the tomb tiles, which is also the symbol of the tomb of the nobility.
Therefore, this tomb is "Jianye" man-made.
The situation should have been this: around 521 AD, a group of Chinese Jianye people were sent by the government to baekje on the Korean Peninsula to help the Baekje royal family build a number of royal tombs (ancient Chinese emperors built tombs before they died). After the burial chamber was repaired, Chinese the glorious tradition of engraving and leaving a name everywhere since ancient times, he used a knife to engrave this line of writing at the entrance of the tomb (there may be more than one engraved on it) to show that this tomb was made by us. At that time, it was definitely not a person who went, but a group of Jianye people.
The Korean Peninsula has been the inheritor and inheritor of Chinese culture since ancient times, and in ancient times they did not have their own culture at all. And there is no need to make another set, much trouble. It is itself from the Past of China, and it is not very normal to bring Over China's mature writing, political and economic system, social system, clothing, etc. Therefore, their history is all part of Chinese history, and it is useless not to admit it.
Do you think my inference makes sense? Comments are welcome.
