Wen 丨 Cao Jingming
Professor Huang Youguang solves the problem of Chinese mouth! Netizen: Dare to lead by example
Girls 20 blind dates in 1 day! Professor Huang Youguang's "polyandry" is on the hot search again, netizens: thank you for the single stick
Welcome to comment on the exchange of views on Huang Youguang!
In the blink of an eye, the Spring Festival is coming again, in this beautiful season of family reunion, there will inevitably be some shortcomings, especially for older single friends, it is inevitable that they will be asked about marriage - marriage.
In fact, for many single friends, it is not that they are unwilling to find a girlfriend, not that they always confess failure when they meet a girl they like, but that they do not even have the opportunity to "meet", let alone confess, fall in love, get married, have children...
If it is better to live and work in the first-line big cities, I am afraid that I am afraid that I am a single man living in a small city or even in the countryside. This is not, a woman went home for the New Year, because it is single, the result of a day to arrange 20 blind dates, not to say that it is a pick, but this frequency, is also very abnormal, it can be seen that in small cities, especially in rural areas for women's demand, is simply very outrageous.
According to relevant statistical results, among the age-appropriate population in China, there are more than 30 million more men than women. In other words, without taking into account the influence of other factors, more than 30 million men in our age-appropriate population will be destined to beat singletons.
First of all, this is only a data statistics in the context, which cannot play a decisive role in solving objective practical problems, but it is also very valuable for reference.
Secondly, in the real objective life, there are other influencing factors, such as cross-age marriage, gay love, singles, transnational marriage... In particular, it is deeply affected by regional influencing factors, taking the situation that the author personally feels as an example, in the bustling areas of large cities, there are definitely more women and fewer men, but if they are placed in the countryside, it is difficult to see unmarried women of the right age.
Therefore, in order to truly solve this problem, it is necessary to propose targeted solutions according to the actual situation.
In addition to these analyses, are there any "expert professors" who offer their own insights?
The answer must be yes, for example, academicians from Australia, famous economists, Professor Huang Youguang of Shanghai Fudan University, before this, because of the above survey data, put forward their own opinions, and now because of the girl's 1 day blind date 20 news, and then on the hot search, ushered in a lot of melon eating masses in line, especially a sentence "thank you for the single stick", this "thank you ah", is it ironic? Or is it sincere?
I believe that there are a thousand Hamlets in the minds of a thousand readers.
Professor Huang Youguang's view, in simple terms, is to promote the "polygamous" marriage relationship, so as to solve the single demand of singles and promote social stability... Similar positive effects, in Professor Huang Youguang's discussion, there are many more, here will not be enumerated one by one, then Professor Huang Youguang came to this conclusion, in addition to the data survey results of the imbalance between men and women, what other influencing factors?
There must be, otherwise how can it be considered an expert professor?
First: In Professor Huang Youguang's view, a woman takes care of the family, whether it is married to a husband, or two husbands, or even multiple husbands, from the perspective of the amount of labor, there will not be much difference, just like cooking the meals eaten by two people and the meals eaten by three people are the same truth, that is, the amount of dishes is a little larger, and even one more dish is not needed.
Second: In Professor Huang Youguang's view, every additional man in the family, that is, every extra husband, will mean an extra labor force, an extra income, and provide a relatively solid and stable material guarantee for the long-term maintenance of the family.
Note that these two reasons are based on professor Huang Youguang, which the author is very disapproving of and angry about, why should a woman act as a housewife instead of a laborer? This is outright unequal treatment.
The intention of this explanation is incorrect, and for the conclusion, it will not only fail to play an elaborative role, but also greatly affect everyone's understanding and treatment. So in addition to the above explanation, is this conclusion alone very absurd and does not have any promotional value?
At least this is what the author thinks, and I firmly oppose it.
To put it cruelly, unless it is the forced intervention of the relevant departments, it is never possible to be 100% equal in the sex ratio, and even if it is really reciprocal, there must be a situation of single sticks, unless it is the intervention of the relevant departments to go further, directly after meeting the age requirements, the other half is automatically assigned.
Therefore, everyone must try to accept the existence of allowing "single sticks", and the rationality of single sticks.
From the perspective of natural selection, no matter how many single sticks there are in the world, there are definitely not many people who are not married. If this is the case, why can some people smoothly enter the palace of marriage, while a small number of people can only be single and become a single stick?
Don't mention what objective factors such as appearance and wealth are at work, in essence, you are not angry.
The whole society is the structure of the pyramid, the author can not deny that wealth, appearance and other influencing factors, can indeed add a person to find a partner success rate, but compared to these few rich people, handsome men, for the vast majority of ordinary people, in fact, all aspects of the conditions are similar, do not think of girls so material, girls are far less than those bare sticks think so shallow, so watery Yanghua.
There is no other way to solve the single stick problem, especially professor Huang Youguang's "polygamous" marriage model, which is simply nonsense.
Now there are more women and fewer men, say this; if there are more women and fewer men in the future, is it time to restore the "polygamous" marriage relationship? It's ridiculous, and improving yourself is the key.
The author is self-nominated
1) Southeast University Professor: Urban pollution is caused by bicycles! Why leave the car behind? It's not that simple
2) Professor Zheng Qiang: What knowledge can I learn on the Internet? Stars can give lectures, and what do teachers do
3) Professor: Let 20-year-old girls marry 40-year-old men, don't put pressure on 20-year-old men, and buy a house and then get married
4) 1 male student with 3 female students to accompany the study? Fudan Professor Chen Ping: You can rely on girls to attract the world's elite
5) Teach calligraphy on beautiful women! Expert: The flesh is beautiful, the calligraphy is beautiful, and the work is beautiful
This article is [Cao Jingming] original, picture source network! #Brick Home ##教授 #