Dissuade the three to help the remarriage shop: love is a thing, it seems that if you want to buy it, you can buy it

Dissuade the three to help the remarriage shop

A "shop in Songyuan, Jilin Province" that "persuaded the three to help remarry" caused people to watch and discuss hotly because of the conspicuous sign of the store. According to the shop owner, you can help dissuade the little three, you can also help remarry, the fee is 20,000 yuan and 70,000 yuan, generally speaking, there is a 70% success rate, if the consultant chooses 20,000 yuan of service, there is no refund after failure, if the consultant chooses 70,000 yuan of service, all refunds after failure. At the same time, there are high-end services for the rich: "big packages". In short, it's all responsible, and the consultant can get things done without even having to come forward.

On the case by the case, "dissuading the three to help remarry" is not a new thing, but it should also be a matter of recent years to achieve this kind of service in broad daylight. The reason for this is not that there is much of a problem with the service itself, but that people's handling of marriage disputes has always been relatively obscure.

Especially like the problem of "third party", in most cases, the heroine is going to go down personally, which makes "Dou Xiaosan" the reality truth, and "persuading Xiaosan" is mostly a theoretical illusion. As for the issue of "remarriage", whenever the two people want to break the mirror and reunite, it is basically a one-sentence thing.

For this question, many people may ask, since the other party already has a "third party" or the other party does not take the initiative to remarry, why do they have to spend money to pull it? To be fair, if you think about the "two-way rush" model of marriage and love, it is obvious that the people who spend money on this kind of service are abusing themselves.

In fact, the promotion of marriage and love is indeed not always equal, especially at the level of marriage and union, and many practical problems are crisscrossed. For a long time, although secular marriage has also advocated love first, in the specific process of union, on the whole, it is still "each takes what is needed".

In general, women obtain more material information through men (having a house, a car, having money to spend), while men achieve reproduction through women (good figure, good looks, able to have children). In this matter, although it is not absolute, it has become the "core program" of the marriage and love order. In this regard, when we look at the service of "dissuading the three to help remarry", it is obvious that we cannot simply think that this is a moral issue, but must rise to the level of life construction to gaze and understand.

As far as "dissuading the three" is concerned, judging from the current cognition of marriage and love, the counselors are probably mainly women, that is, the contest between two women. It is no exaggeration to say that if both men were moral and self-respecting, it is obvious that such a problem would not arise. Because we all know very well that the men caught in the middle belong to the strong, and most of them are economically strong.

Such an emphasis on this detail is not to say that it is difficult for the economically strong to have love, but that when the heroine faces the disorder of marriage and love, the first person to denounce is not the pillow person, but chooses to see the third party as a thorn in the eye and a thorn in the flesh; the same paradox is that some third parties know that the other party has a family, still pounce upwards, and also boast "I love him".

This kind of pulling is mainly to clarify what kind of existence the man behind the third party who can be dissuaded is. You know, a man who secretly has fun with a third party from his wife, and then because his wife dissuades the third party to return to the family, it is obviously absurd for such a man to have a relationship with love (based on the current mainstream love scale). And the only thing that probably makes sense is that both women are secularists.

For "helping to remarry", the counselor should most likely be based on practical considerations, such as "involving children", such as "neither party has found a more suitable person", and then "the divorce was sloppy". All in all, the active party is not completely passive, at least there is a certain degree of certainty, on this issue, it is obviously relatively easy to "dissuade the three".

Remember that there is a lyric in "Love Buying and Selling" that is "love is not what you want to buy, you can buy if you want to buy", the implication is that if love is big, it is related to morality, small, but also linked to conscience. But back to the actual marriage and love order, when there is the existence of "dissuading the three to help the remarriage shop", it is probably smoother for the lyrics to be sung as "love this thing, you can buy it if you want".