In the case of Xie Na's house purchase incident, it may not be a very appropriate analogy.
For example, a certain boss (a character in a film and television drama, a non-realistic character) has raised a little three, a date with a small three, and needs the help of an employee to cover up, after the fact, the boss hopes that the employee will help him keep secrets and not let this matter be known by his wife. (After all, skipping orders affect reputation)
Well, in order not to expose things, the boss has about three ways to choose.
First: No longer have contact with this little three, completely cut off, or get rid of this little three, and replace it with a new little three that the employee does not know. (Don't buy that suite)
Second: Shut up employees in unspeakable ways. (The reality is a legal society, strongly opposed to doing so, but it is just buying and selling a house, and there is no need to be extreme)
Third: give employees a promotion and a raise, which should be the most common way. (Sign a confidentiality agreement, take a confidentiality fee of 30,000 or 50,000 yuan, or a sealing fee, and appease or block the mouth of the intermediary who has made a contribution)
But in the end, the boss did not choose any of the above three roads, but took the fourth road and directly fired the employees. (First say that I am not optimistic about this house, I don't want to buy it, and then I bypass the agent and buy the same apartment, the agent is not angry, and the buyer sends a lawyer to warn)
As a result, the employee who did not get any income naturally had no obligation to keep secrets and directly leaked the boss's affairs to his wife. (Agents find media exposure, disgusting home buyers who are public figures)
In simple terms, saving a million intermediary fees, but forgetting to spend a little money to appease a small character who seems unimportant, saving a lot of money, not willing to spend a small amount of money, and then letting everyone watch a good show.
