Why are city dwellers of the 1960s and 1970s worthy of the envy of some? Now some of the three rural authors say that in the 1960s and 1970s, urban hukou people had money and good prestige. Is this really the case?

Why are city dwellers of the 1960s and 1970s worthy of the envy of some?

Now some of the three rural authors say that in the 1960s and 1970s, urban hukou people had money and good prestige.

Is this really the case?

In the 1960s and 1970s, due to perennial wars, China's urban population was only about 1% of the rural population, and at that time, the population of several of the country's largest megacities was only one million people. This is one of them.

Second, at that time, the so-called welfare of urban hukou people was only a few more food stamps than in the rural areas, and the ration was only supplied. [Cloth tickets are the same as rural people have. The population of other towns and cities had no welfare at all, and there was no state to give the peasants money in vain, as now, and there was no state to arrange jobs, and at that time the urban population was mostly small craftsmen who ate by their own labor, so that there were too many idle and unemployed people in the cities at that time, and there was a movement in the cities of the whole country, saying that we also have two hands and do not eat idle meals in the cities, so a large number of people went to the countryside to find food to eat. Does the current Sannong author know this historical plot?

Third, in those days, the real urban hukou with high gold content and popularity were not the original urban residents, but the peasant elite from the countryside!

Please read this! Why is this so, because of the change of political power, the main party and government assets in the cities mainly come from the old revolutionary fighters in the countryside, as well as the soldiers of the army who retired year after year, and arranged to enter the factories of state-owned enterprises. It is not that the original residents of the city must arrange jobs. At that time, the peasant elite came not only from the army, but also millions of college and secondary school graduates from the countryside, and these intellectual elites from the peasants were all arranged as state cadres to enter government offices, schools, hospitals, banks and enterprises. If, now the authors of the three rural areas envy the urban people? To say that urban people are good and mighty is essentially to envy the peasant elites who stay in the countryside to plan the soil and go to the city to wash their feet and grasp the power of the party, government, military, finance, and enterprises.

Some rural writers believe that urban people have money and rural people have no money, so urban people can change their fate because they have money, and rural people cannot change their fate.

This is a mistake that goes against history's assumptions. After decades of revolution, the original indigenous urban people did not have the peasants to have money at that time! Why? Because the urban people do not have the local tyrants to divide the land and share the floating wealth, the majority of the urban people are proletariats who have nothing. At that time, everyone in the whole society was economically equal, and even the peasant elite who entered the city in that era and held the power of the party, government, military, and military finances had very little income, and the economy was very embarrassing, for example, General Chen Geng was considered a city man, and at first his monthly salary was only twelve yuan. And a peasant is worth one yuan per work, which is equivalent to thirty yuan a month. If in some places a work is worth fifty cents, it is fifteen yuan a month. This is because the Communists from the countryside of that era were most equal.

Finally, I tell you a true story: my second uncle is a textile factory security worker, married to the rural Jiang Mou, because he is a family member of the workers, the factory leaders arranged for the second uncle to be a textile female worker, worked for half a year, three shifts, the second uncle felt that the workers' lives were too bitter, not as comfortable and free as the rural peasants, the urban population ration supply only five or two or six dollars a day grain, she felt that it was not better than the countryside to eat, the countryside at that time in the field to catch a crab lobster yellow cockroach, can also become a good meal, where to catch the city people? Therefore, the second uncle and mother quarreled every day to go back to the countryside as a farmer, and at first the second uncle refused, so the second uncle wanted to hang himself on the river, and the factory leaders watched the noisy chickens and dogs restless, and simply let the second uncle go to her hometown with the second uncle!

Not the people of that era, some of the three rural writers after the 1980s and 90s, insisted that the urban people had money in the 60s and 70s, but the rural people had no money, in fact, that era was the most equal era in the country's unprecedented economy.

Some people will ask, then why do rural people drill holes to enter the urban hukou? This is because: First, at that time, the revolutionary fighters of the rural elite went to the cities, the dormitories were distributed organizationally, they could eat five or two or six imperial grains a day, they could not work in the fields, and they had the right to be a cadre in the city. All this creates the illusion that urban people have money and power, and that they can eat enough and not be hungry.

Second, in that era when there was no mechanization, the rural labor force was heavy, while the urban areas were relatively less manual and easier to work.

These two points are the reasons why rural people envy urban people.

Therefore, all the three rural writers who did not come from that era, especially the authors after 708090, should not open their mouths to comment on that era, and still less easily attack the current urban residents who are mainly composed of rural elites.