Today with the staff to arrange work, the first two sentences are not quite right. The employee said, 1. Leader you still don't understand what I mean. I actually... 2. Lead you to the same idea as the leader before me

Today with the staff to arrange work, the first two sentences are not quite right. The employee said, 1. Leader you still don't understand what I mean. I actually... 2. Lead you is not the same as the leader before me, and sure enough, everyone's ideas are different.

From a simple 2 sentences, it can basically be determined that this is a "self" type personality. "You don't understand what I mean, so you have to understand me." "The previous leadership idea is like this, you are different from him, so you first understand the previous leader's thinking." Is this what employees want? The leader arranges a job, and needs to take care of so many of your inner emotional paths, so why are you still looking for you to do this thing?

Conversely, when we encounter a lot of new needs from leaders, is it not the first reaction that "we" need to be understood?

Of course not! The only thing that needs to be done is to quickly understand the leader's intentions, start to move first, and then communicate with the leader after having certain difficulties and results. "I understand that." "This was the way before that. . . ."

But why don't many people do that? It is laziness in thought and behavior. Wait for people to feed, the question is, how many people are willing to raise you?