Looking at Douban, "Changjin Lake" is 7.4 points, and "Watergate Bridge" is 7.2 points, which is slightly worse. It is normal to think about it, there are many problems with "Chosin Lake", and the messy style is one of them

Looking at Douban, "Changjin Lake" is 7.4 points, and "Watergate Bridge" is 7.2 points, which is slightly worse. Think about it normally, "Chosin Lake" has a lot of problems, the style is messy is one of them, "Watergate Bridge" is actually the same number of problems, the audience's perception is good because the style is unified, but it is not that other problems have disappeared.

As a Xu Ke film, "Water gate bridge" is still better than "Chosin Lake". This conclusion does not change, and there is no need to seek common ground while reserving differences.

To another "Sniper", 7.7 points, this rating is inexplicably high. I was seduced by his high ratings, took my son to the cinema to brush it again, and when I left the scene, my son said that it was not good, not as good as "Watergate Bridge".

A lot of articles on the Internet that scream for the film's schedule can't be said to be hydrological, at least some of them are marketing soft texts. Comparing the two films horizontally, "Sniper" did not even win the most likely line to win "Watergate Bridge", although it was just as bad.

The "bullet time" shot, which existed more than 20 years ago, has been abused by various movies, and has actually been used as a treasure by Zhang Dao (I don't know whether it is a big Zhang director or a small Zhang director), and it appears at least three or four times in the movie.

There was no hope for the plot, but it was really unexpected to be weak:

In order to encourage the rescue comrades to survive, the people of the fifth class all gathered together to sing the battle song [Cover their faces]. Big brother, what about the snipers on both sides, so singing is not afraid of exposing the position?

Based on the speculative judgment that "the enemy wants to capture me alive", the squad leader Liu Wenwu put down his gun, raised his hand and went out to "change one for one", so as not to worry about the enemy shooting him in the leg? Catching alive does not mean that you have to be caught alive completely. Of course, the enemy was so stupid that he didn't shoot him and let him rush into the trench with the bomb, which is another slot.

If you want to talk about the performance, Cao Cao, who played the SNIPER of the US Army, is a highlight, but it is limited to the first hour. On the side of our army, the soldiers speak in dialect, which is not unusual or brilliant. The problem was that as soon as a comrade-in-arms fell, everyone shed tears together. It's not that our army can't cry, it's not that men can't cry, but this cries too often, right? Why don't the U.S. troops on the other side cry? The U.S. military does not have a comradeship? Or is it the cultural difference between East and West? I have to mix something soft into the cruel war, which is understandable, but don't need so many tears, right? It seems that this is not enough to show that our warriors have feelings.