Recently, in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, a young child was locked in the car, firefighters rushed to the rescue, but the parents did not agree to break the window, insisting on waiting for the lock master. Watching the child in the car with a flushed face and crying, the firefighters brought combat clothes to cover the windows of the car, and from time to time used the instrument to measure the temperature to prevent the temperature in the car from being too high and the child was in danger. After a long wait, the locksmith came to open the car door and the child was successfully rescued.
First of all, parents find out early, the child is not in danger for the time being. If the child is already in shock, I think parents may not have to wait for 119 to break the window. Secondly, the current temperature is not very high, and the temperature inside the car will not rise rapidly. If the temperature is 38 degrees now, I think parents will not be so calm to wait for the lock to be opened.
Again, it is not so difficult to contact the lock master, and the lock master will not say that he will not come for a long time. If this is in the wilderness, such as a high-speed service area or something, the recent unlocking master is 50 kilometers away from you, I think parents will not be stupid to wait. Of course, my guess is that parents really care about their children. So why should the child wait? Because parents judge that their children are most likely okay and can afford to wait. Many people say that the judgment standard of parents is children vs window money.
In fact, it should be "the danger faced by the child VS window money". Parents believe that the danger to their children is not great. More critically, the firefighters have not left, so the family believes that the bottom line is not to worry. Because in this case, people do not die suddenly, there is a process. If the child has signs of shock, the firefighter is around anyway, and the window can be broken at any time. Since we haven't reached that point now, of course we can wait. It is easy to understand that you see this scene as a love affair, the lock unlocker is the "male god (goddess)", and the firefighter is the spare tire. Is it smooth?
In this scenario, parents actually bear only one risk: the sudden death of the child. But this probability is objectively very low, so parents are willing to take this risk, and firefighters provide a lower limit: broken windows to save people, so they can calmly wait for the lock master to come and solve the problem at a smaller cost. So, obviously, parents are the kind of standard exquisite egoism, the abacus is very good, how to get the maximum benefits clearly, but also do not forget to pass on the risk, is simply an actuary.
There is a saying that goes well, parents don't have to pass the exam, it's terrible to think about. Because of their own negligence to lock their children in the car, the child was trapped for a long time in an emergency, the first time did not want to rescue the child, but pushed three obstacles, careful calculation, such a parent can really be called a parent?
Or is the car the true love, but the child is an accident? If the child is not treated in time for any accident, the parent is fully responsible. Whether it is criticism or blame, this parent's behavior has broken through the bottom line of parenthood, and they feel sad and pity for their children.
In the past, when I was equipping insurance for my baby, I learned that the insurance amount for children under 10 years old could not exceed 200,000, and children aged 10-18 should not exceed 500,000, and I thought it was strange at the time, so I asked the company why there was such a rule. The response was that the moral hazard experienced by children would be greatly increased if there was no limit on the sum insured, which was also to prevent the insured from setting limits for the purpose of intentionally harming the insured person.
If a girlfriend falls into the water, there is no legal responsibility for not saving; the mother falls into the water, and it is a crime not to save; similarly, if her own child falls into the water, it is also a crime not to save. In this matter, the child is locked in the car, the parent not only does not save, but also prevents the firefighters from rescue, if the child has a three long and two short, the parent may also be a crime. The Criminal Law defines the crime of negligence as follows: it is a crime of negligence to foresee that one's own actions may lead to harmful results, and because of credulity that one can avoid them, and the result of harmful results occurs.
Here, this parent, has seen his child in the car with a red face, wow wow crying, obviously foreseeing that the child may be in danger of life, but he is very confident, feel that he has called the lock master, wait a while, it's okay, wait... The child is okay now, the car window is very expensive, wait, it is not yet the time to break the window, continue to wait, it is really not OK, and then break the window. In short, this parent just feels that he has the ability and self-confidence to control the situation and will not put his child's life in danger. It is this mentality, if it causes serious consequences, the parent is suspected of committing a crime, the victim is still his own child, there is nothing to say.
Fortunately, the child was finally rescued. Speaking of this parent, he would rather have his child locked in the car and risk his life than break the window to save his child, which is really..... I feel sorry for this child and hope that his growth will be smooth and smooth.
I just want to ask, at that time, the sun was so big at the scene, the temperature in the car was so high, I didn't care about the safety of the child at all, was there another hidden plot in this child's life? If the child has syncope because the temperature in the car is too high, or the oxygen is too small, or even more serious, the parents will not take the child to the hospital, go to the hospital, I am afraid it is not necessarily cheaper than repairing the car window. To tell the truth, in such a situation, if you really want to save the child, pick up a sharp stone from the side of the road, and quickly solve it, is it better to smash the cylinder of Sima Guang?
The child was full of red face in the car, wow wow crying, the firefighters were more anxious than the child's parents, and then took the combat suit to cover the window, and then used the instrument to measure the temperature, monitor the temperature inside the car, is really worried that the child is in danger. The parents were indifferent, and the firefighters who were still harmed waited for the lock unlocker in the big sun, occupying public resources. Speaking of going or to save your three melons and two dates, you will get by with money in the future.
Take a look at a case On September 7, 2016, Tingting, a 4-year-old girl from The Sunshine Bilingual Kindergarten in Jingtaili, Hedong District, was suffocated by a locked "school bus" for a long time, and on the day of the incident, the "school bus" only picked up Tingting's child. About 8 hours after being locked in the car, the driver Zhang Mou found that the child had been in the car, and when he was sent to the hospital for rescue, the child had no breathing, his lips and neck were bruised, and his eyes were open.
On September 7, at 7:45 a.m., the girl Tingting was sent to the kindergarten's "school bus", the so-called "school bus", which was actually a Buick car, the driver was Zhang Mou, and Tingting sat in the rear seat directly behind Zhang Mou. After arriving at the kindergarten, the car was parked in a clearing at the entrance, there was no shade, no shelter, and before 16:00 on September 7, Tianjin city was basically sunny, the sun was strong, and the meteorological record showed that the maximum temperature was 31 °C. The driver Zhang Mou recorded a confession and said that the car was parked on the slope, and Zhang Mou went to find a brick pad behind the wheel to prevent slipping, and then forgot about the child.
At about 16:00, the driver Zhang Mou came to pick up the child from school, which found that something had happened. Teacher Liu, the class teacher, said: "He came to me to ask for a child, I said that Tingting did not come for a day, he said how is it possible, and then suddenly remembered something, and quickly ran outside." He took the child back from the car and put it on this red sofa, and I saw him pinch the child and call the child's name, but the child did not respond. "It's been 8 hours since I received the child to the time the child had an accident