I object to all the views of Zhang Jie and his wife, especially those who talk about their personality. Let me talk about why I'm against you from a few angles. First of all, you don't know about exclusive listings and non-exclusives

I object to all the views of Zhang Jie and his wife, especially those who talk about their personality. Let me talk about why I'm against you from a few angles.

First of all, don't you know the difference between exclusive and non-exclusive listings? If you sell a house online, believe it or not, more than a dozen real estate agents will call you to help you sell your house. At this point, the homeowner agrees to sell by multiple agents, which is known as a non-exclusive agent.

Second, what is the jump order? What disgusts me the most is that you all say that people are out of order. If you take someone to see the house, contact the buyer and seller, the buyer and seller negotiate the price at your intermediary company, and finally both parties plan to trade, but feel that it is not cost-effective. Putting aside the middleman and trading again, this is called skipping orders. If you're just taking people to see the house, what's the name of a ticket hopping? Before you come out and speak, can you clarify this concept?

Third, the intermediary fee is the voice that rationalizes the information spread. You should also make it clear that no one denies that information spreads are reasonable, but you should also make it clear that you are not the only one who can search for information on the internet, but also a buyer. For non-exclusive sales, it is easy for the buyer to spot multiple sales, at which point he discusses the price of the same property with multiple intermediaries at the same time and finally chooses the lowest price. Isn't this normal? This is closer to the form of the tender. The only downside to this situation is the homeowner, but he should bear this unfavorable price when he chooses multiple intermediaries to sell and enjoys the benefits of more buyers to see the home. This is called taking on the burden of good and bad. Don't you understand this?

Fourth, combining the first and second points, what is the nature of your agency's work and profit model, especially for non-exclusive homes. You're betting on the possibility of trading. The income from the belt can cover all your efforts, both done and unfinished. It's your innate job. You have to accept the possibility that the house is not finished. It depends on the nature of your work. If you benefit from the transaction, you have to accept that the house was never sold, and even at the last minute, there is a risk of collapse, and you have to accept that the buyer chooses the most cost-effective intermediary. After all, showing people is only one of the services you offer, and it's also the upfront service you want to close the deal with.

In this case, the most disgusting thing for me is a bunch of people talking about people jumping ship, saying that people's families are poor and bad guys are going to break down. Can you figure out the nature of the transaction first?

Also, say a few more words as an answer to some of the people below.

For sellers, as far as I know, the middleman saves all the hassle of repeated house viewing and communication in the early days, but this only applies to sellers. That is also the first point I mentioned above. The difference between exclusivity and non-exclusivity. Exclusive I don't think there is no agreement between the middleman and the seller. No agreement was reached. This is a loophole in your work. There is a protocol. You should go to the seller's trouble with the agreement and ask him to compensate you for your losses, but this has nothing to do with the buyer; as far as non-exclusivity is concerned, if the seller enjoys the convenience of taking people to see the house in multiple ways, then he must bear the disadvantage of the buyer using multiple intermediaries to drive down the house price. That's what I said above. The corresponding intermediary must accept the possibility that the buyer may end up choosing the one with the lowest offer among several intermediaries. There is never a way to be 100% favorable to one side. There is no such good thing.

In addition, the service of the intermediary company is not only to show you the house, but also to earn the price difference information. Its services are a range of services, from house supply to early exchange and house viewing ~ tripartite price negotiation ~ all process error services in the middle ~ real estate certificates to guarantee funds in the middle. If the agent tells you to take you to see the house, it will even provide services for you, which is unreasonable.

What's more, I also found an intermediary agency to deal with the matter in the beginning. The core reasons I found the middleman were: 1. the middleman was clear about all the processes and required materials, which allowed me to process them faster; 2. the intermediary business process could be handled by the travel service intermediary; and 3. the intermediary could provide security for the intermediary funds and vouchers between the buyer and the seller. This is the core service provided by intermediaries. If the core values of intermediaries are unclear, this confusion will continue.