Ask the teacher. Now many A-class cars have reduced the door anti-collision beam, is there a big impact on safety?
A - To be reasonable, this kind of thing luck component is larger, daily driving is difficult to encounter such a bad luck on the side of the door collision, and this situation is also the chassis and B-pillar is the main force part, the tube is the research institute or C-NCAP, the anti-collision beam inside the door in the side crash test is not a key role, personally feel, or the significance of the side curtain will be greater, unless you are letting the side of the heavy motorcycle "ride the face", it is indeed very dangerous. Of course, the individual is not to the manufacturer to wash the floor, the reduction is the reduction of the allocation, if you are not at ease with this aspect, or consider the SUV model with a higher chassis, the side collision will transmit more force to the chassis, and can not hurt the fragile door.
Can Fei always talk about Haoying's hybrid system, organizational structure and recommended configuration?
A- Body structure and chassis have nothing to say, urban SUVs are very common load-bearing body design, front McPherson rear multi-link suspension layout, there is not much lightweight, unlike the crown road is good is an aluminum alloy hem arm, on the basis of controlling costs can also ensure body stiffness, which is enough.
As for the hybrid system, Honda i-MMD updated to the current second generation can really play, high-power coaxial dual motor module compared to Toyota THS more emphasis on the role of electric drive, and through multiple sets of clutch to achieve relatively flexible electromechanical coupling and power shunting, low and medium speed quiet and easy to open, within 80km / h power response bar, is not in the field of hybrid transmission without independent transmission to bypass Toyota broke out of the new world.
As for stability, the series has been on the market for so many years, in addition to having had a downhill overcharging before, there is no problem, and the reliability is also trustworthy.
Configuration, in fact, the minimum functional configuration of the hybrid version is completely enough to cope with daily use, if you dislike the weaving seat, then choose the deluxe version, the screen is larger, there are fog lights.
Teacher, please analyze the newly listed Ford Lingrui, which is similar to the price of Changan CS75 and GS4, which one is better in terms of cost performance?
A-Three models are more recommended CS75. Although Lingrui hangs the Ford logo, the large size + low price looks really tempting, but Jiangling Ford has been focusing on commercial vehicles before, the experience of building passenger cars is insufficient (similar to the original dry tooling, now do hardcover), the car does not sell well, there is no need to be a "guinea pig"; Trumpchi GS4 looks good, but the assembly process and driving quality are not very good, especially compared with the Changan CS75 is more obvious, and the Changan CS75 series is the best selling independent compact SUV in China. The comprehensive strength is really good, and basically can not find major faults.
Q&A column is updated every working day, everyone has any questions about the car can be left below the column to ask questions (not the dialog box of the public number Ha, easy to leak), we will arrange the answer in order, no answer to please be patient, sometimes more questions will be ranked to the second or third day, keep an eye on it ~