When it comes to "chicken babies", many people will inexplicably be like "playing chicken blood", often more excited than the parents of those chicken babies, and they will criticize all kinds of arguments about how bad chicken babies are.
And many people have not experienced it at all, even if it is "looking", it is just a matter of looking at a fur and directly opening a batch of peeping leopards.
On the other hand, in addition to a very small number of people who promote chicken babies for commercial purposes, the vast majority of chicken baby parents either work hard silently or move forward with a small number of people, but they are never affected by those outside.
They are not very susceptible to external interference throughout.
Even for many people, they don't take the time to care about this, such as having to argue with someone on the Internet. For them to have this time, it is more meaningful to prepare something for their children or to communicate with like-minded parents to learn something.
After all, the parents of the real chicken babies will actually pay attention to the "self-chicken".
But it is not to say that all kinds of criticism and denial are meaningless, because if many problems are developed according to the set conditions, there will indeed be those well-set problems, such as a series of negative effects brought about by advanced learning, such as paying too much attention to the "intellectual education" of children and ignoring other aspects of cultivation.
So the parents of rational chicken babies will treat these as "suggestions" - they will not give up on the chicken babies, but will use these as a warning and used to further improve their chicken baby concept.
Difficulties, setbacks, etc. will never become an insurmountable wall in front of people who really work hard, but will only become a "whetstone" to make themselves better.
In fact, many times in the "chicken baby" matter we just focus on caring for children, the attention and understanding of parents is often very arbitrary, one-sided.
For example, many people will think that these parents are just "let the next generation fly hard if they can't fly", or think that these parents are very extreme, only paying attention to the "score theory" of their children's achievements, and so on.
So is that really the case?
There really will be such a thing, for sure, and even cause children to have physical and mental health problems because of this, we all know this kind of thing, don't we?
But is the problem with this kind of thing the "chicken baby" itself?
Besides, don't say that it is the parents of the chicken baby, even those who are not chicken babies can't encounter this kind of thing?
In fact, the vast majority of problems do not arise for the sole reason.
But for those parents who are really "chicken babies", they actually know, master, and understand far more than ordinary parents.
And don't think that they only care about the child's achievements, or only pay attention to the child's "intellectual education".
If we really know that the "ambition" of some of these parents is to break through the blockade of the "school valve", to rely on their own strength (only their own strength is available) to break through the barriers of the class, and then we go to see their chickens and babies at the same time "self-chicken" to pay, I think many people will have different feelings.
Perhaps at this time, the person who was still indignant about "chicken baby" and "chicken blood" will begin to feel what is the reward of heaven, what is not to give up, what is to treat life with a positive attitude...
"Chicken baby" where those marketing numbers say that it is a chicken baby, not those who have never been in contact with it can subjectively imagine, in the eyes of these people to enroll children in a few classes, buy a few textbooks, take a few certificates, advance school, etc. even if it is a "chicken baby"...
Many people ignore whether "chicken babies" or "cramming ducks", the object of cultivation and education is a person, not an animal.
One can "feed" animals forcibly, regardless of whether they need to be forced, but how can knowledge be "filled" in by a person, especially one who does not want to learn yet?
Children are also human beings, and people will have all kinds of physical, mental, psychological and other problems.
Just like many people have a headache in English learning, every day they look forward to it, argue to reduce the weight of English or simply kick English out of the middle and high school entrance examinations, and then let those who are interested in learning learn it themselves.
A bunch of reasons seem reasonable, but how many parents have you seen chicken babies pay attention to?
For them, no matter how difficult the problem has a solution, one does not work I will change another, the other can not work I will continue to change, until the line is changed - because knowledge can not rely on "cramming" to fill in, even if it is rote memorization is temporary, "Ebbinghaus forgetting curve" to understand, this truth everyone understands, right?
Those things that even the parents who have "lying flat" understand, and the parents of the chicken babies really don't understand it?
For example, countless people who even know the Olympiad and the Olympiad shout and kill the Olympiad, and describe its harm in various ways, but it is never a problem for the parents of those chicken babies.
Who said that to learn mathematics well, you must brush up on problems, memorize formulas, and memorize routines? Isn't it not fragrant to cultivate interests, develop habits, and so on?
Those who claim that they will not enroll their children in classes, will not let their children brush up on the problems, and even go to sleep even if the homework is not written, or the parents who can't move to talk about "reading" really think that their children will read more books than those who are "chicken babies"?
A lot of people think this way only because they're evaluating others with their own time utilization, so they don't believe they're children anyway, so why can they do so many things? The only explanation is that something is not done or not done...
Seeing this, it is estimated that some people will want to question me: "You are an educational institution, you are creating/selling anxiety!" ”
Unfortunately, I didn't have one.
Because what I'm saying is just stating the facts.
As for whether these statements will lead to a positive change in attitude or will make people continue to choose to passively avoid, this is not something I can control, I can only say that the harder I try, the luckier I am.
Only things that we must accept and bear, but cannot control, can bring us stress and make us anxious.
But what if we could take control?
In fact, the original "chicken baby" was just a small range of ridicule, more of a greeting and encouragement, for example, I remember six or seven years ago we in some parent groups in the morning greeting is a sentence: "Early, get up chicken!" "In fact, what I want to express is to cheer together."
It's just that slowly "chicken baby" has been given a lot of messy meanings, and has begun to define to some extremes, in fact, too many so-called chicken blood parents, they will never think that chicken baby is to let the child keep learning, never think that chicken baby = test = high score.
The above picture seems to have been "officially recognized" of the statement, for the past has been said for many years we feel quite incredible - otherwise, we have always thought that we are parents to give ourselves chicken blood, how can it suddenly become chicken blood to children?
More chicken parents are doing things that are cultivating their children's "learning ability" or "learning ability".
Discussions such as how to cultivate children's independent learning ability and internal drive have always been things that chicken parents are very concerned about, pay attention to, and constantly explore and explore.
And all of this part of the parents have many people who have never been static chicken babies, they will spend a lot of time and energy from pedagogy, psychology, nutrition and other aspects of learning, sorting out those that are helpful to their children to use.
Is this something that parents who have never chickened or who only follow the trend can imagine?
These people will only let their children learn this and do that, and most of them just imitate and follow the trend regardless of their children's actual situation, and there is also a commonality that seems to be very busy and tired, but they will never "chicken themselves".
So a lot of times the chicken baby fails because of the "little horse-drawn cart" - as a parent does not provide the child with a power source with enough energy, with the child's improvement and progress, the parents can not keep up with the pace of the child...
"Double reduction" has been more than half a year, so that many people think that the culprit caused by educational anxiety, parents' chicken blood, the education and training industry has also suffered the heaviest blow in history, so chicken blood, chicken babies these things are really less?
To know that too many chicken blood parents themselves are middle-class or better conditions of the family, for them, they have a very stable three views, have a clear understanding of "change" or "demand", because the vast majority of them are also step by step.
There are no shortcuts other than hard work, and they know that improving efficiency and quality may not be enough for children to work on their own.
In the face of absolute strength, those self-soothing, even negative moves, are useless, and can only be recognized and looked up to.
Therefore, many chicken baby parents who are looked down upon and despised by everyone are actually very powerful, and they have to compete with those groups who have more high-quality resources at the head, eliminate all kinds of interference from left and right and behind them, and always stay sober and take into account all aspects.
So they rarely waste time arguing about something, arguing about anything.
Whether it is for themselves, for children or for families, for them, this is a practice that has no retreat.
Of course, in the end, it is still necessary to say that the chicken baby itself is not a chicken baby that gives the child more classes, buys more teaching aids, lets the child read a few more books, and does a few problems, and only requires the child but never involves self-improvement of the chicken baby, after all, it will not last.