World War II set the United States in the first position in the economic world. Attracting high-end talent from overseas and immigrating to the United States adds to economic and technological development, but it becomes a cheap way to acquire talent

World War II set the United States in the first position in the economic world. Attracting high-end talent from overseas and immigrating to the United States adds to economic and technological development, but turning it into a cheap way to acquire talent is the wrong path.

In 1945, after the end of World War II, the United States selected more than 1,000 experts in physics, chemistry, rockets, weapons manufacturing and other aspects from Germany and immigrated to the United States. They contributed to the technological and economic prosperity of the United States after World War II.

By 2022, the United States is expected to have more than 200,000 career visas available to overseas talent. As early as the end of the 1990s, more than 60,000 overseas talents received U.S. visas every year. They have taken up important positions in American companies, research institutes, universities and other important positions, which has become a beautiful landscape.

But attracting overseas talent to work in the U.S. also poses a problem that cannot be ignored. Ordinary students in the United States, who want to go to college, cannot compete with economically strong international students for faculty resources; because overseas professionals have been successful in their respective positions, they are more likely to become successful in the sense of empiricism, and it is easier to get the recognition of business owners than local interns. As a result, high-paying jobs in many companies and institutes have reduced demand for native-born Americans who prefer to reuse people who have already succeeded, or who have proven talented, students.

There are many aristocrats in Europe, and there are some chaebols in the United States, who have not fallen for a hundred years, which has to do with platform advantages and has nothing to do with whether they are top talents. The active King of England was able to have the position he has today, as a result of a family professional monopoly, not a position won based on the global managers who came together and scored it together on the basis of a combination of scores.

The United States will tilt its own platform resources to a large number of overseas talents, and the result of this will only make ordinary natives, without room for social status, unable to have high-paying occupations, thus limiting their employment development space and reducing the happiness of ordinary Americans.