A woman in Guangxi pushed down a sexually harassed man and caused her death, and was claimed 870,000 by her family! The family of the deceased believes that Wang's death is inseparable from the woman Pan, and it is reasonable to ask her to compensate! But the court believed that this was justified in self-defense, and there was no need to pay a penny! Netizen: Good sentence!
On May 27, 2020, Ms. Pan and Wang went to a friend's house to drink together, and it was more than 10 o'clock in the evening after drinking. Ms. Pan was afraid to go home alone at night, so she let Wang accompany her home, but she never expected that Wang was on the road with wine, and she was kissing and hugging herself. Ms. Pan was very disgusted and pushed Wang away with her hand to refuse.
But Wang Mou was still not dead after being pushed away many times, and on the highway of Luo Xiu Town, he once again wanted to forcibly go up and hug Ms. Pan. When Ms. Pan saw the situation, she subconsciously reached out her hand to push Wang Mou away, but she did not expect this push, and directly pushed Wang Mou to the ground and fell unconscious. Ms. Pan was so frightened that she quickly called someone, sent Wang to the hospital, and took the initiative to pay 10,000 yuan in advance. But in the end, Wang Mou still died of severe brain injury.
After Wang's death, Ms. Pan was very stressed and guilty, and she offered to compensate the family of the deceased with 10,000 yuan, but the family of the deceased thought it was too little. Ms. Pan offered to add 50,000, but was rejected. Later, Wang's son reported the case, Ms. Pan voluntarily turned herself in, and the police transferred Ms. Pan for review and prosecution on suspicion of manslaughter.
The procuratorate believes that Ms. Pan pushed Wang away out of instinctive resistance when she was repeatedly molested by Wang, and this act was not a crime. Wang's family was not satisfied, and filed a complaint and a civil lawsuit, demanding that Ms. Pan compensate for death compensation, funeral expenses, spiritual consolation funds, etc. totaling more than 870,000 yuan. The two sides have a fierce debate on this:
The family of the deceased believes that It was Ms. Pan who took the initiative to let Wang accompany her home, which shows that she does not dislike Wang. Although There was something wrong with Wang on the road, Ms. Pan shot too hard and directly overturned Wang, causing her to die of head injury, so she had an unshirkable responsibility for Wang's death, and it was reasonable to ask her to compensate.
The Court and Ms. Poon's defence counsel held that Ms. Poon's conduct was a legitimate defence and did not require compensation for the following reasons:
1. Under the premise that Ms. Pan clearly refused and resisted, Pan repeatedly went against the woman's wishes and made unusual acts against her. Under the circumstances at that time, in order to protect her body from being touched by Wang, Ms. Pan pushed Wang away out of instinct, which met the conditions of legitimate defense.
2. After Wang was pushed to the ground, Ms. Pan took the initiative to call someone to send Wang to the hospital, and also took the initiative to give out 10,000 yuan, which shows that Ms. Pan subjectively did not have the intention to hurt Wang. Moreover, Ms. Pan only pushed Wang with her own hand the whole time, and the behavior did not exceed the necessary limit.
3. Wang Mou was immediately sent to the hospital after being unconscious, Ms. Wang did not run, nor did she see death or save, and there was no negligence in rescue. Wang's death was caused by his own desire to misbehave with Ms. Pan.
In summary, the court held that it was reasonable for Ms. Pan to push away Wang out of instinct, and That Wang, as a fully civil actor, was responsible for what she had done, so Ms. Pan's behavior was a legitimate defense and did not need to bear civil liability according to law!
For this matter, some netizens said that in this case, Ms. Wang is the victim, and if she is sentenced to compensation, then legitimate defense has no meaning.
Some netizens also said that Wang Mou just borrowed wine to play crazy, I don't think that drinking is confused, drinking too much, vomiting, uncomfortable, sleeping, are normal, deliberately using hands and feet on others, is to borrow wine to spill, deserve!
Some netizens said that the court's judgment was fair and safeguarded the dignity of the law. Justify your defense! If you have done such a shameful thing, don't be silent, why do you still want to borrow the money of the dead to get rich?! His family also wants to compensate?!
I also think the court has ruled well on this matter! All indecent acts shall be severely adjudicated, and all consequences caused by their illegal acts shall be borne by themselves. Otherwise, some bad men will be more arrogant in the future and harass women with alcohol! This incident is a stern warning to those who borrow alcohol to commit shameful acts!
In addition, it also reminds some of our female friends that in the process of heterosexual interaction, we must grasp the boundaries, and what should be avoided is still avoided! There is a difference between men and women, and no one can change this fact!
