The college entrance examination is a news source, and it is also a threshold-free issue that anyone can point fingers and talk about. When the college entrance examination is released, the opinion on the fairness of the college entrance examination is the opinion, and the current enrollment plan is put into the province.

The college entrance examination is a news source, and it is also a threshold-free issue that anyone can point fingers and talk about. When the college entrance examination is released, there are opinions on the fairness of the college entrance examination, criticism and criticism of the current provincial enrollment plan, and the criticism and even rumor-mongering of the current provincial enrollment plan and the provincial demarcation admission model, which will surely become the hottest topic in the special period of time.

China's college entrance examination is a selective examination, in the past folk said "wear straw shoes or wear leather shoes" and "labor or hard work" all for this exam, the competition is bound to be fierce, at a certain time and place or even almost white-hot fighting. In ancient and modern China and abroad, it seems that there is no way to ensure absolute fairness and impartiality in formulating rules and judging wins and losses. The current college entrance examination system does have room for heated discussion, reflection, and criticism, and there is indeed a need to solicit suggestions and seek public opinion to optimize and improve, however, such bad ideas as "one roll in the country and one unified score line in the whole country" are destined to be banned drugs for The reform of China's basic education and China's college entrance examination system. Imhoto brothers, those who repeatedly clamor for this issue are naïve and shallow and speak without thinking, some are watching the hilarity and forgetting their positions, and some are spokesmen and carriers of certain interest groups.

The reason why it is said that the "national unified score line" is a bad idea, and the brothers' reasoning is at least:

First, a national volume and a national unified admission score line must be premised on "national unified teaching materials, national unified teaching program, national unified teaching progress, and national unified examination outline". If this is the case, the lessons learned from the exploration of china's basic education diversification reform will be all in vain, and the teaching and learning atmosphere with the college entrance examination as the only baton will be comprehensively solidified and strengthened. At such a cost, it is still unknown whether it can truly improve the fairness of the college entrance examination, but it will definitely profoundly hurt the existing basic education system, and at the same time bring predictable and unforeseeable profound implications to higher education.

Second, during the Republic of China period, Cai Yuanpei and other academic leaders argued for many days about "running a good university first, or running a primary school first", and one faction believed that without a good university, it would not be possible to cultivate excellent teachers, so how could Chinese education be revitalized? One faction emphasizes that if primary schools are not run well, if the foundation is not laid, and there is no good source of students, where will universities recruit outstanding students? Lao Cai and others are all looking forward to the reality in China at present, and it is difficult for students who do not enjoy high-quality basic education to enter top domestic universities. If the whole country unifies the score line of the college entrance examination, the third year students of Beijing No. 4 Middle School and Shanghai Middle School and Ali District Senior High School and Jinghe County Senior High School compete indiscriminately. The basic educational resources enjoyed by each other are very different. In order to be absolutely fair, is it difficult to become the national lottery of Beijing Jingshan Primary School and Shanghai Huishi Primary School, and the national pinch of the People's Congress Affiliated Middle School and Fudan Affiliated Middle School? Or to divide the famous teachers and school building equipment in the field of basic education in the country to the provinces and municipalities? The demand for fairness is always worthy of praise and admiration, but the institutional design based on romanticism and the utopian and overt suggestions, think that they have become absurd, and putting them into practice will definitely bring disasters to the country and the people.

Third, the main purpose of calling for a "national unified score line" is to eliminate the admission preference or care of famous schools for students in the provinces and regions where they are located, which is well intentioned but not feasible. According to the assumption of rational people, after the national unified score line, how can Anhui have the internal driving force to respond to the needs of the University of Science and Technology of China? How can Henan persuade the public opinion of the province to vigorously tilt the limited resources of higher education to Zhengzhou University to make it first-class as soon as possible, and then let aspiring young people across the country share the blood and sweat of the taxpayers in Yu Province? What kind of emotional attitude will Beijing, Shanghai and other megacities with tight land use and strict control of the household registration population come up with when Tsinghua Peking University Fudan Jiaotong University needs land use indicators and the introduction of talents must enter the household? Extreme prediction, it is likely that each province and region will no longer pay blood and build provincial colleges and universities - they have spent money and worked hard to run a first-class university, and with the admission of outstanding students from other provinces, the benefits of the children of this province are limited and not to mention, the difficulty of entering first-class universities may be even greater. The university in the region is mediocre and not in the flow, it does not matter, encourage children to study well and compete for a degree in other provinces. If there is a strange circle of "resources taken from the local people, but outsiders benefit greatly" in the whole country, Mr. Trump can't figure it out, and you can't figure it out. As for the ministry-affiliated colleges and universities, in addition to the central government's financial payment, I am afraid that it is difficult to get the wholehearted and genuine support of the local government. You can't repay the favor, so why should I sacrifice myself to fulfill it? Or some people say that now that China's economy is developed, the central finance can take over all the universities, and this inefficient and high-input model will put China's education in place?

In the case of insufficient supply of high-quality educational resources, far from the balance between supply and demand or oversupply, no matter how the college entrance examination system is designed, it can only be relatively fair. Stock adjustment is not as good as incremental reform, plugging loopholes in the system, putting an end to Chen Chunxiu's cruel youth and sad encounters; refreshing social concepts, so that the unnamed people on the list still have a smooth road under their feet; expanding development space, so that young people with ideas and methods stand out, secretly thinking that it is a top priority.

First-class top students, no matter how they take the exam, they can probably open a first-class university. They are real warriors. According to my observation, the most powerful people who call for "one roll in the whole country and unified admission score line" are mostly middle school students, second-class students and their parents. Once such a proposal is landed, they will only lose money and will not suffer losses. If Tsinghua and Peking University are admitted by 100% in Henan, the 211 students in the province can understand the moonlight of the lotus pond and accompany the map of a tower lake in the capital. If so, does Qingbei still have the color of idols and powerful factions?

The competition of "setting rules first, and then winning or losing" and "measuring a ruler to the end" can basically confirm that its fair and just attributes dominate. The most responsible and controllable thing for competitive participants is to strive to enhance their core competitiveness, rather than fantasizing about changing the rules.