Why do many netizens compare new energy vehicles to "big toys"?
Because since the Model S released by Tesla in 2012, equipped with a display with a center console function, with a touch tablet instead of mechanical buttons, after the biometric technology, voice control, gesture control technology is gradually applied to the smart cockpit, so that the car has more entertainment functions, not just transportation and other tools. Coupled with the fact that the battery of new energy vehicles can be idle for entertainment for a long time, its intelligent advantages will be more prominent. Consumers naturally also want to consider when starting a new energy vehicle, intelligence is often included in the main reference factor. Therefore, the positioning of many new energy vehicles will emphasize intelligence.
Image courtesy of Future Think Tank
Coincidentally, in the official promotion of zero-run C11, it is not difficult to find that the positioning of C11 is "all-intelligent super-enjoy electric SUV", emphasizing intelligence, and the intelligent cockpit, NEDC ultra-long endurance, 100 km acceleration time, intelligent driver assistance system 4 major product selling points, intelligence also occupies 2 seats. Entering the car, the first thing that catches the eye is the most popular 10.25 + 10.25 + 12.8-inch triple screen design, which is also full of scientific and technological sense.
As everyone knows, on March 30, China Automobile Research Institute released the CCRT (Intelligent Electric Vehicle) test results of zero-run C11, with a total score of 69.4 points, of which the pull point was intelligent, scoring only 42.6 points, and there was still a gap from the passing line.
This test result can be said to have punched the face of the intelligence of C11 propaganda. As the saying goes, the layman looks at the bustle, and the insider looks at the doorway. In fact, the CCRT test of China Automobile Research Institute mainly includes five aspects: intelligence, electrification, driving experience, health and environmental protection, quality and protection, and C11 is not as intelligent as it is, and the scores of the other 4 evaluation indicators are above 70 points, so we still focus on the intelligent aspects of C11 and look at the specific lost points.
The intelligent part of the CCRT test of China Automobile Research Institute tested intelligent driving and intelligent experience respectively, of which intelligent driving tested a total of 7 system prompts, car following ability, intelligent parking ability, other obstacle recognition and response ability, line patrol ability, combination control ability, and driver monitoring. According to the test results, the radar map shows that the system prompt is a full score, the following ability is about 76 points, the intelligent parking ability is about 30 points, and the other 4 items are 0 points, and the 7 items score only 35.7 points.
The intelligent experience part tested the three contents of intelligent prompts, intelligent driving and intelligent interaction, and its scores were roughly: 60 points, 40 points, 78 points, and 3 scores were only 53 points.
Seeing this, the question in my mind is: This is estimated to be the lowest score in the history of CCRT evaluation of China Automobile Research Institute, right? Is it difficult to take the C11 version to evaluate?
As everyone knows, the C11 of the China Automobile Research Institute is the premium version with a guidance price of 209,800 yuan, from the perspective of intelligent configuration, the car has facial recognition, which can realize fatigue driving tips; there is also the Internet of Vehicles and the realization of OTA upgrades to meet the driver's interaction with the car. In terms of intelligent assisted driving, there are also up to 22 items such as parallel assist, lane departure warning, active safety system, full-speed adaptive cruise and even automatic parking.
Judging from the evaluation results, perhaps C11 is empty. After all, in third-party reviews and official publicity, the author must trust third-party reviews.
In addition, the CCRT driver assistance evaluation is not just starting, but began in 2018, China Automobile Research Institute noted that the majority of new models are currently equipped with intelligent driving assistance, but the market does not have a unified three-party evaluation standard, consumers are difficult to quantify the gap between different models. Only intuitively demonstrated through the unified CCRT evaluation system, CCRT is not only designed from the beginning, it is close enough to our daily car life, as well as 1 million kilometers of traffic big data, around the typical traffic scenes in China to set evaluation items and standards. It is not only a credible, fair and objective third-party test, but also a test that can directly give consumers car purchase recommendations through data results.
This year, China Automobile Research Institute released a total of 4 new energy vehicle CCRT (intelligent electric vehicle) test results, in addition to C11 is not exceptional, Gaohe HiPhi X with 87.9 points to get the highest score, Lantu FREE with 80.9 points followed, AIOV V PLUS also scored 76.3 points.
Finally, the author would like to say to consumers that no matter how good the official publicity is, they still have to go to the actual test driving experience, listen to the feelings of riders, and do not be too blind for starting a large toy of 100,000 or hundreds of thousands.
Attached is a radar chart of the scores of the four aspects of zero-run C11 electrification, driving experience, health and environmental protection, quality and security:
Note: The above evaluation picture comes from the official website of China Automobile Center