First, the comfort configuration test comparison in the car
Among the three models, only the Tesla Model Y is not equipped with a rear center headrest, which will have a certain impact on the comfort and head safety of the passengers in the middle of the rear row. Both the Zero Run C11 and WM W6 are equipped with headrests in the middle of the rear seats, not only the size is not significantly "shrunk", the interior filling is also relatively soft, and both support up and down adjustment, and the overall performance is satisfactory.
In terms of the front central armrest, all three models are wrapped in leather materials, which has an excellent texture, but unfortunately they do not support angle and front and rear adjustment, which is less adaptable to the driver. Among them, the position of the armrest of the zero-run C11 is low, and if you want to get sufficient support, you must take the initiative to "lean up", and the comfort is general. In contrast, the WM W6 and Tesla Model Y have higher armrest positions, which provide good support for the driver's elbow in a standard sitting position.
Through the test data, the adjustable range of the main driver's seat of the three models is relatively good, the zero-run C11 and Tesla Model Y measured the results of 29cm and 26cm respectively, and the performance of the WM W6 is slightly inferior, but it also reaches 22cm, which can meet daily use. In the steering wheel part, the angle adjustment of tesla model Y reaches 14.3 degrees, and the adjustable distance between front and rear is 6cm, which is obviously advantageous compared to the other two models. The steering wheel of the WM W6 has an adjustable angle of 6.5° and a front and rear distance of 4cm. The Zero Run C11 failed to measure the adjustable distance between the front and back of the steering wheel due to the special reasons of the test drive itself. Overall, the performance of the three models in the comfort configuration of the car is flat, there are no surprise highlights, and the slot point cannot be talked about, which is useless. Of course, the front central armrests of all three models are non-adjustable fixed design, and the comfort performance is average, which is indeed regrettable.
Second, multimedia configuration test comparison
1. USB power connector
In terms of charging interface, the performance of the three models is different. Among them, the zero-run C11 is equipped with 2 USB Type-C interfaces and 1 12V power supply in the front storage compartment, and 2 USB interfaces are equipped below the rear air conditioner outlet, after testing, the rear USB interface voltage is 5.06V, the current is 1.02A; the 2 USB interfaces in the front row of WM W6 are located in the wireless charging board of the mobile phone under the center console, and the rear USB interface is located below the air outlet of the rear air conditioner. After testing, the front USB interface voltage current is 4.98V and 1.22A, the rear is 5.06V and 1.54A, compared to the rear USB interface charging efficiency is higher; Tesla Model Y in the front / rear row each equipped with 2 Type-C interface, in view of the popularity of the Type-C interface is not high, so the traditional USB Type-A interface is more practical.
2. Car navigation
The navigation interface of W6 WM supports two input methods of pinyin and handwriting, and when using keyboard input, the virtual keys are larger in size and reasonable in layout. Although the handwriting input system has a high recognition rate and a fast response speed, the initial area of the virtual handwriting board is small, and the area will be automatically expanded only when the writing begins, the design is novel, but it is not convenient for daily use. After you enter a destination, the system quickly associates the relevant destination information based on the keyword. After clicking on the destination to start navigation, the system will provide a variety of route plans, users can choose the most suitable plan according to their own needs.
Tesla Model Y is equipped with a navigation system with Lenovo, but after confirming the location, navigation will only provide one path to choose from. In terms of details, on the left side of the navigation interface, there will be detailed directions for turning or in/out of the auxiliary road, which is very practical. In addition, the navigation settings bar provides options to avoid toll booths, license plate restrictions, and concise navigation announcements, which drivers can set according to their own needs.
The zero-run C11's navigation interface can be projected into the dashboard, and the WM W6 also supports this function. After the navigation starts, WM W6 will provide three mapping display options on the right side of the full LCD dashboard, including guidance information, small thumbnail map and large size thumbnail map, but unfortunately does not support the full-screen display map function. Since the Tesla Model Y didn't design a standalone dashboard, it couldn't implement that feature.
Third, the comparison of storage space in the car
In terms of storage space in the car, as a medium-sized SUV, the overall performance of the three models is relatively good. Although the number of storage slots is different, the location design is reasonable, and the volume is more objective, which can basically meet the needs of daily use.
The zero-run C11 is designed with a total of 9 storage compartments, although the number is not much, but the position design of each storage compartment is very reasonable. The front drainage cup holder is equipped with a tablet with anti-slip mats in front of it, and supports wireless charging of mobile phones, in addition to this part of the area also has a storage slot with a cover plate, and the internal volume performance is good. The number of rear storage is small, except for the rear door panel storage slot and the central armrest cup holder, there is no storage place, even the front seat and rear pocket are not equipped, which is a little regrettable.
The W6 provides a total of 12 storage spaces (in addition to the cup holder), the front row storage space is larger, the front door panel storage compartment adopts a through-through design, and provides a separate cup slot, and a small storage compartment is also designed on the left side of the steering wheel to store some change or bills. The front of the central channel provides a wireless charging pad for mobile phones, and the lower part of the center console is also hollowed out, forming an open storage space. The central armrest box has a large internal volume and good practicality.
Tesla Model Y all-car storage space (except for the cup holder) a total of 9, each storage slot volume is very impressive, and the details are in place. The front door panel storage slot is large in volume and has a large area of flocked material inside, which looks very graded. It is a little unfortunate that the front drain cup holder is not equipped with a limiter inside. The rear door panel storage slots are similar to the front row, and the volume is considerable. There are also back pockets on the back of the front seats, but the back pockets are designed to be slightly tighter and can only accommodate smaller items. In addition, the rear armrest box is equipped with two cup holders and a limiter inside.
Comparison of trunk space
The volume performance of the zero-run C11 trunk belongs to the mainstream level of the same level, the platform is relatively flat, and the storage slot is also designed on the right side. When the rear seats are lowered, a relatively flat space can be formed, and there is no pressure to carry large items. In addition, after lifting the platform, the bottom is equipped with a storage slot with a considerable volume, which can have a good storage space in addition to the usual charging cables.
WM W6 series standard electric trunk, support induction opening and position memory function, the opening and closing process are relatively easy. However, since the trunk closing button is located on the left side of the tailgate, daily use is not very smooth. The interior shape of the trunk is relatively regular, and the space occupied by the wheel arches on both sides is relatively small, and the practicality is good. The rear seats support a 4/6 scale reclining, but when receded, they cannot be flattened with the trunk floor, and there is still room for optimization.
The Tesla Model Y's trunk space is considerable, and thanks to the hatchback design, the trunk opening is also large, making it easy to carry large items. In terms of details, the trunk platform is relatively flat, and there are hollow treatments on both sides, which can be used to place small items. The left side of the trunk interior is equipped with a one-button reclining button for the rear seats, which can be receded to form an almost flat storage space. In addition, there is a huge storage slot designed under the trunk platform, which can hold many items.
Fourth, the safety configuration test link
In the data testing session, we measured and compared the field of view that is most commonly used in the daily use of the vehicle. In the blind spot test session directly in front of the field of view, we used the 70 cm high pile bucket as a reference object, and then adjusted the relative position of the vehicle until the upper edge of the pile bucket could be seen in the main driver's seat.
In the actual measurement process, the measured data of the front field of view distance of the three models are relatively excellent, and as a medium-sized SUV, the blind area of the field of vision in front is actually not large. In contrast, tesla Model Y has the best measured performance, with a blind spot distance of only 190cm in the front field of view, which belongs to the upstream level in the same level of models tested; the zero-run C11 performance is second, with a distance of 240cm. In contrast, the WM W6 is not as good as the other two models, but it is also in the middle and upper reaches of the same class that has been tested.
During the field of view test of exterior mirrors, none of the three models were equipped with double curvature lenses. In terms of test results, the WM W6 performed the best, with data of 27.9 degrees on the left and 19.8 degrees on the right, which is in the middle and upper reaches of the same class of models tested. In contrast, the Zero Run C11 and Tesla Model Y test scores were unsatisfactory, both below the average of their peers.
Fifth, reversing auxiliary configuration comparison
In terms of configuration, the three models are equipped with front and rear parking radars, and the overall configuration performance is satisfactory. Referring to the previous test experience, the closer to 25cm in the continuous beeping stage, the closer it is to daily use habits. In terms of test results, there was a slight gap in the overall performance of the three models. In terms of front radar, the WM W6 has the farthest detection distance and can sense objects at 90cm, which is better than the other two models. The distance of the three models in the radar continuous buzzing stage is deviated from the test experience value, of which the performance of the WM W6 and Tesla Model Y is relatively better, the radar nearest prompt distance is 20cm, and the nearest distance of the zero-run C11 is not very reasonable, only 15cm, and the reserved safety value is low.
The rear parking radar part is also the farthest detection distance of the WM W6, although the 90cm performance is not ideal, but it still has certain advantages over the other two models. Overall, the rear radar detection distance of the three models is different from the daily use habits, compared with the Tesla Model Y's nearest distance of 20cm, which is slightly better.
Zero-run C11 is equipped with a 360-degree panoramic image, although the image does not support multi-angle viewing, but fortunately, the screen resolution is higher, the camera quality is also good, so the picture quality is relatively clear, and it can provide a good reference for the driver when reversing.
All WM W6 models are equipped with 360-degree panoramic image function, which has good panoramic image clarity, provides auxiliary lines that can be steered on, and also supports 2D and 3D display modes, as well as real-time pictures with up to 7 viewing angles. Although the distortion around the panoramic image is not serious, there are obvious shadow areas under the virtual vehicle, which slightly affect the perception.
The Tesla Model Y only offers basic reversing imagery and is the worst of the three models. Fortunately, the Model Y is equipped with a camera from multiple angles, and there is no image only in front of the vehicle. The image clarity is acceptable, and the distortion is not serious, and the actual experience feels good.
In daily use, vehicles often encounter the situation of turning or turning around in narrow roads, and the minimum turning radius of the vehicle is very important at this time. The minimum turning radius refers to the circular radius of the trajectory that rolls over the support plane in the center of the outer steering wheel when the steering wheel is turned to the limit position and the car is steering at the lowest stable speed. The smaller the turning radius, the better the maneuverability of the car. Know the minimum turning radius of your car, and know what to expect when the vehicle turns or makes a U-turn to avoid scratching and other situations. After actual measurement, the turning radius of WM W6 is 5.12m, and the turning radius of Zero-run C11 and Tesla Model Y is 5.15m and 5.5m, respectively. In contrast, the Tesla Model Y's data is a bit larger in the same class of models tested, and there is a large space to reserve when turning around.
summary
The models participating in this comparison are all medium-sized SUVs under the new power brand, although the price difference is large, but the configuration performance is basically at the same level. As a benchmark product in the field of today's pure electric medium-sizeD SUVs, the strength of Tesla Model Y is beyond doubt, and the brand, power, endurance performance and driver assistance system are quite interesting, not to mention its excellent sales performance. On the whole, although tesla model Y still has some small slots in terms of practicality, such as not equipped with the rear middle seat headrest, but the overall performance is still good, at least in the new power brand can be in the first echelon. The practical performance of the zero-run C11 and WM W6 is also basically in line with expectations, but there are still deficiencies in the details and need to be further improved, but they are harmless. Of course, if only to meet the daily household standards, then the performance of these three models is undoubtedly qualified, there is no obvious hard injury, and there is not much gap compared with traditional car companies.