#Gu Ailing's open hanging life has also encountered leverage # My view is very simple, the premise of comparison is to be comparable.
Phoenix TV host Guo Yangzi sprinkled a rebuttal of the bar essence, can not say that there is no reason, but in fact, she did not say the point.
Gu Ailing's view is that Gu Ailing was born in a Kochi family, received a top education in the United States from an early age, and advocated freedom, which cannot be copied.
Such a view is obviously one-sided and need not be refuted. Guo Yangzi's rebuttal is: no matter how good the birth, if you want to achieve impressive achievements, you must also rely on your own efforts.
This is basically another correct nonsense, and I think to refute this view, you only need to say three words: Quan Hong Chan.
Therefore, Guo Yangzi, who emphasizes hard work, and those who emphasize origin, have made the same mistake, that is, they have ignored the simplest and most important point: genius.
Gu Ailing and Quan Hongchan are both geniuses.
The premise of comparison is that there is comparability. Compare genius with genius, and it is possible to see something wrong.
For example, hard work, it must be very hard, which is nothing to say, otherwise no matter how talented you are, you will not be able to come out.
For example, family origin, this is a bit of a head.
Gu Ailing is undoubtedly superior, if nothing else, father Haval, mother Stanford, or ski instructor. Such a family environment, even if it can't become a proud son of heaven like Gu Ailing, it should not be bad.
What about All Red Chan? His parents were simple farmers, and his father was still sick, so I am afraid that he rarely even saw diving. Quan Hongchan was accidentally discovered by the enlightenment coach, and the family agreed that she would learn to dive, and the direct reason was that there could be a way out, rather than being determined to be the best from a young age like Gu Ailing.
Gu Ailing said that she just wanted to be herself, and Quan Hongchan wanted to earn money to see her father.
If you talk about talent and achievement, then Quan Hong chan may be a little higher than Gu Ailing, Quan Hong Chan was discovered by the coach at the age of seven, underwent diving training, knew nothing about diving before, won the provincial championship at the age of 11, won the national championship at the age of 13, and won the Olympic champion at the age of 14. Gu Ailing, although she also learned freestyle skiing at the age of 8 and won the children's championship at the age of 9, she was exposed to skiing since she was a child, and her mother was a ski instructor and had a certain family origin.
But if we talk about comprehensive quality, there is no doubt that Gu Ailing is far superior to Quan Hongchan. In addition to sports, Gu Ailing is also quite insightful about fashion, also likes to read and write, or a bully, likes quantum mechanics, Stanford is his own eight exams, almost full score.
A superior family only provides better conditions for growth, and does not necessarily make a person outstanding. It doesn't determine a person's height, but it can go down to the bottom.
If you want to excel, you have to rely on personal diligence and hard work.
However, without talent, no matter how good the family is, no matter how hard you try, you can't become Gu Ailing.
The family environment is not good, not only can not determine the height of a person, but also can not go to the bottom, there is no worst, only worse.
If you want to excel, you need to work hard, but if you don't have talent, no matter how hard you work, you can't become a full red chan.
Of course, it's certain that a privileged family can give people more opportunities to grow and trial and error. No one wants to hone themselves and hope that their family will be poor.
Comparing Quan Hongchan with Gu Ailing is truly of practical significance, for example, how to make those who have talents try not to be buried? How to make those who are gifted grow as much as possible?
Gu Ailing's future is broad and lofty; what about Quan Hongchan, what will happen after the end of her sports career?
However, I think it is not so appropriate to use genius to motivate ordinary people.
The premise of comparison is that there is comparability.
Correctly understand yourself, admit your own ordinary, you will not blindly learn from it, there will be no leverage, what do you leverage? What is there to do with an ordinary man and a genius?
