Take the case we handled as an example: as long as the litigation work on the weak side is done well, even for housewives without income, it is not difficult to fight for the custody of a legitimate son (full text of the judgment, page 39): #广州离婚律师梁聪
1. The woman is a housewife, neither a fixed job nor a stable income (the man has a good income and is the middle leader of the company, under the same circumstances, the man's side has the advantage of fighting for child custody);
2. The son born in marriage is at least five years old (the woman's side does not have the bonus advantage of the child's young age);
3. The son born in marriage is a man, and the unwritten principle of same-sex plus points is more favorable to the man (under the same circumstances, the probability of awarding the man is greater);
4. The man has a school district room in his name, and the man's parents also have a school district room in his name (another big plus for the man's side); #深圳离婚律师梁聪
5. The hukou of the legitimate son and the school he attended are all in the school district house under the man's name before marriage, and from this point of view, the custody of the child should also be awarded to the man;
6. Both parties have provided a lot of favorable evidence for the child to be brought up by themselves (our side provides more, more than a hundred groups);
7. After our comprehensive efforts in presenting evidence, cross-examination, discussion and other aspects (multi-pronged), the judge finally adopted the opinions of our side, and awarded the legitimate child to our client to carry and support, and the other party paid maintenance (if it is a different agent, we represent the other party's side, this victory will actually be simpler, because the other party's side has too many advantages).
