On the one hand, "labor shortage" and on the other hand, "200 million flexible employment", what does it mean?
After the New Year, many enterprises in the south are shouting about "labor shortage", but on the other hand, according to the statistics of relevant departments on the mainland, the scale of flexible employment in mainland China has reached about 200 million people, accounting for about one-seventh of the total population of the country.
Is flexible employment really more fragrant than corporate?
Flexible employment not only includes some people who quit their jobs to find jobs, but also includes more entrepreneurs, people who live part-time, food delivery riders, etc. They have to work non-stop every day, and they are really "hands-on".
There are also highly paid people among them, but they either rely on youth or physical strength, and the degree of hardship is not experienced by personal experience.
Enterprises are supposed to be the homes of flexible workers, so why do they "have a home and don't return"?
One is low wages, and the other is brutal overtime.
A society cannot stabilize young people in their own jobs because they are too "relaxed" in the management of enterprise employment and too "weakened" in the protection of workers' rights and interests.
An enterprise cannot develop its employees into old employees because the management of the enterprise is unscientific, inhumane, and does not keep pace with the times.
"200 million flexible employment" is worth pondering.
