laitimes

Isn't falsification the scientific spirit advocated by scientific people? How can a falsification of Western archaeology become anti-science? It became a folk science? - By "Jim here" to see the Western archaeology falsification routine this

author:Sink the side of the boat

Isn't falsification the scientific spirit advocated by scientific people? How can a falsification of Western archaeology become anti-science? It became a folk science?

- "Jim here" to see western archaeology as a fake routine

This is an archaeological discovery in Britain reported by the BBC the year before, saying that it is an ancient Roman fresco.

However, a stone block is inscribed with several Chinese characters "Jim here". No matter how you interpret it, these words are modern things in terms of font, vocabulary, and syntax! In the end, they had to declare: This stone was put in by someone jokingly!

Then I said: Isn't the whole mural a joke buried in the ground?

Reason further: How could the whole so-called archaeological discovery in Europe not be falsified? How many ingredients can be trusted?

In any case, this so-called ancient Roman fresco is 100% fake!

First, why the frescoes lie flat in the field is still understandable on the walls of buildings.

Second, what is the use? Was it that the people of ancient Britain were very rich and had nothing to do as personal art? This place should have been a poor and remote place in ancient Roman times!

Third, if it were not for the development of the Internet and the rapid detection of bugs by Chinese netizens, would this discovery be recorded in the history of Western civilization?

Fourth, why add Chinese characters? Increase the sense of mystery, so as to fool the money and many people stupid C people.

Fifth, one of the purposes is: academic falsification! In terms of scholarship and literature, there are all over the world, and China's Chu Ci, Mozi, and Daodejing all have the elements of the ancient forgeries of later generations. The West is no special either!

Sixth, the second purpose is to create tourism value! Don't you see that the location of the "cultural relics" is a good place to develop tourist attractions? When they make the news, they first state that they are not going to move to the museum, is the intention not obvious? Isn't it very easy and happy to fool around with a lot of money? Unfortunately, there was a bug that was not easy to do, and it was hurriedly filled back! It is speculated that it will reappear decades later when people begin to forget and cannot verify certain details. The statue of the "Goddess venus" is such a routine.

Seventh, why is there such a low-level bug? Because this is low-level falsification! This time the work is in the more remote rural fields in the United Kingdom, there is no talent, it is estimated that those few Chinese characters are a few Chinese characters translated by a person who does not know Chinese at all with a mobile phone, and then carved on the stone.

The ancient civilizations of the West cannot be said to be pseudo-histories, because the ancient texts of the mainland record the civilizations of the near west and far west (ancient book language) near the Mediterranean. However, from the above examples, it can be inferred that many cultural relics in the West are forged, and their main purpose is nothing more than fame and profit!

For a long time, social activity in the West was mainly private. It was only later that tech activities slowly became official, but historical research remained private — the opposite of what seems to be the opposite of China. Many cultural relics are found privately, accidentally, and isolated, and there is no mutual confirmation in the surrounding environment, there is no record in the literature, and there is no inheritance in society! And they were all discovered in the 16th century after the beginning of industrialization in the West (people got rich). These findings, if put into the present, are difficult to admit (including westerners themselves).

For example: the statue of Venus, according to their information, was originally found in a cave! This cave is not a temple or a place of cultural activity, so it is a unique discovery of this one thing. The purpose is not clear, it is just a work of art. There is no record of similar craftsmanship in the literature, and there is not a single sculpture with similar craftsmanship in the Byzantine Empire, as the successor of ancient Greek culture, is civilization degenerating? What is even more bloody is that the original is now missing, and the display is clearly a replica! A group of bureaucrats who advocate science, think with your intelligent brains, how many credible elements are there? Here I also "folk science" a little: this is the work of the Renaissance!

First of all, the realistic and individual style of this statue is consistent with the realistic human body painting of the Renaissance. Moreover, many statues of different periods and regions of the so-called "ancient Greece" found later are exactly the same style.

Secondly, the sculptures are clearly buddha statues from the medieval south Asian country of Gandhara, revealing the body in the style of tropical South Asians, and human statues are the technology produced by religious needs. Westerners have inherited it and done it more figuratively, secularly, and individually.

Third, the Byzantine Empire, which was the mantle of ancient Greece and Rome, had no such skills and works at all.

Finally, their purpose in pretending to be antiquities is, of course, to make money. Although this statue is very exquisite, it was not worth a few dollars at the time, and if it was forged into ancient Greece, the price must have doubled a hundredfold. This is normal all over the world.

In short, the art of sculpture in the West matured after modern industrialization, and the so-called "ancient Greek" sculptures are all forgeries! They are all modern works and are derived from the techniques of the medieval Buddha's kingdom. They have no ability to transcend the times, no spirit to detach from matter!

Isn't falsification the scientific spirit advocated by scientific people? How can a falsification of Western archaeology become anti-science? It became a folk science? - By "Jim here" to see the Western archaeology falsification routine this
Isn't falsification the scientific spirit advocated by scientific people? How can a falsification of Western archaeology become anti-science? It became a folk science? - By "Jim here" to see the Western archaeology falsification routine this
Isn't falsification the scientific spirit advocated by scientific people? How can a falsification of Western archaeology become anti-science? It became a folk science? - By "Jim here" to see the Western archaeology falsification routine this

Read on