@yiyi tumbler read a few issues of your article and quickly followed. I am particularly impressed that you are nearly ninety years old and can still publish long articles with a clear mind. Good energy,

@yiyi tumbler

After reading a few issues of your article, I quickly followed it. I am particularly impressed that you are nearly ninety years old and can still publish long articles with a clear mind. Good energy must come from a good body. On the occasion of the Spring Festival, I wish you better and better health, the Year of the Tiger, the Tiger, and the great luck!

While admiring you, I seem to have a different view of you, I just ask you a question, please do not hesitate to teach. Why can Sima Nan's fire ignite Lenovo's public opinion, and what will happen if Sima Nan changes an enterprise?

I have a feeling that you are very simple, jealous and hateful, like an old child in people's eyes. The advantage of children is that they are simple and cute, and the disadvantage is that they are not rational enough. Children see the world in a straight line, can not see the face, more difficult to three-dimensional.

I don't know if you have thought about it, lenovo in the minds of the Chinese people has been like a day in the sky, pinned on unlimited expectations, and is regarded as the light of domestic goods. Of course, as the leader, Liu Chuanzhi has an aura on his head and a "godfather" coat on his body. Starting from 250,000 yuan, the communication room is based, leading more than 50,000 employees of Lenovo to advance into the world's top 500 companies, and paying more than 10 billion yuan in taxes every year. With these brilliant appearances, Liu Chuanzhi can be described as a great achievement, lending Sima Nan a boldness and not daring to rush to ignite public opinion, let alone let the fire of public opinion burn.

However, the fire was ignited by Sima Nan and continued to burn for three months. You believe that "horse fans" are so easily brainwashed, so easily confused by the rootless and unfounded words you describe. In this regard, Phoenix Satellite TV once had a special debate program that targeted all the questioning guests. A satellite TV cannot invite some unknown people, and these people who are invited do not dare to talk about it on the TV station. You've probably seen all of this. So, is it just Sima Nan who is questioning?

No wind, no waves, no cause and no effect. Your original intention may be good, to protect a company, especially a company like Lenovo that was once worthy of our pride from being hurt by some people with ulterior motives. The focus of the problem was not on enterprises from the beginning, but on people. Speaking of which, I suddenly remembered the woodpecker. Are woodpeckers harming the tree or curing the tree by catching insects?

After a high fever of public opinion, although many problems are still looking at flowers in the fog, still looking at the moon in the water, people finally return to reason. But the result is obvious, that is, to rip off someone's "godfather" coat and blow away the halo above someone's head. To Ni Guangnan, who is bent on scientific and technological innovation and wants to create nuclear "core" technology, he has given a proper name. What is Sima Nan's crime?

I'm so sorry! My original intention was not to stand up to some people, it was a little immature thinking. If you can answer my question, I will be very grateful!