laitimes

The executor owes 1.4 million yuan and tries to steal the beam for the pillar, but it is useless, and obediently repays the money. The executor engaged in the liquor business, and after becoming the executor, he terminated the warehouse leasing agreement with the logistics company

author:Executive Jun

The executor owes 1.4 million yuan and tries to steal the beam for the pillar, but it is useless, and obediently repays the money. The executor, who was engaged in a liquor business, terminated the warehouse lease agreement with the logistics company after becoming the executor, and then asked his son to re-sign the agreement with the logistics company in an attempt to circumvent the execution.

What the applicant for execution can hear is that the executor's warehouse is rented in a logistics company, but when the executor arrives at the logistics company, he finds that the tenant warehouse is the company of the executor's son.

It turned out that the executor first terminated the lease agreement with the logistics company, and then let his son's company sign an agreement with the logistics company in an attempt to circumvent the execution.

At this time, the enforcement officer believed that the person subject to enforcement had transferred the property, decisively seized the liquor in the warehouse, and informed the son of the person subject to enforcement that he could raise objections. As a result, the next day, the executor took 1.4 million yuan to repay the money.

#Enforce the King's Saying# #Law Popularization Action#

The most important thing here is that the executive personnel asked the logistics company to provide two lease agreements before and after, so that the executives could resolutely seize the liquor.

The son of the executor can raise an objection to enforcement according to the law, but why is it not mentioned?

It should be that the objection procedure takes time, for fear of missing out on this period of time, and at the same time, the objection may not be supported.

Of course, the applicant for enforcement can provide clues in a timely manner, and only then can the case be executed to the money.

What do you think about this?

I am @ Executive Jun, please pay attention to me, an ordinary but private goods a lot of legal people, have questions please private message.

Read on