On the seventh day of the Chinese New Year, a boy in a down jacket happily rushed to the door of the stationery store, originally just ready to buy some small snacks, but saw the Ultraman card next to him. So the boy hesitated in front of the card, not expecting that a sentence said by the owner of the stationery store at this time caused the judicial department to intervene.
The little boy in the down jacket was only ten years old, and after reporting to his mother, he took the money and ran to the stationery store to buy snacks to eat. Unexpectedly, when the stationery store owner saw the boy wandering repeatedly in front of the Ultraman card, he actually said, "What are you buying?" It is better to buy cards, which can also be sold for money. He also said, "If you want to buy an Ultraman card, you can buy it, and if you look at the 300 yuan, it's different from others." ”
The little boy was not firm, and with the temptation of the stationery store owner, he spent 9800 yuan to buy Ultraman cards.
Ultraman cards are not made of rare materials, and their original value may be worth a few cents, but they can be sold for hundreds of thousands of dollars in the market.
Ultraman cards are the printing of an Ultraman photo on a card the size of a playing card, plus the corresponding combat power values, and make various styles and levels.
This may seem to be nothing special to adults, but many children cherish the rare cards in it. It can even become an object for comparison and comparison between children.
After the boy's mother found that nearly 10,000 yuan was missing in the family, she finally found that her child had spent money to buy ultraman cards. In desperation, I can only go to the stationery store and theorize with the boss.
Unexpectedly, the owner of the stationery store said, "My own children can't see the problem of not being able to find a merchant, and they are not forcing their children to take money from their pockets."
In the end, the two sides were deadlocked, and could only seek judicial help to ask the judiciary to intervene in the matter and find a solution.
Personally, I think that the matter itself is not against the law by the store owner, but the way, means, and language used are too uncomfortable, disgusting, and lack a basic sense of social morality and responsibility.
The main responsibility for the matter is still on the parent's side, after all, it is indeed the child who takes the initiative to pay for it, and no one persecutes him.
I also hope that all parents will pay attention to the fact that children are indeed the people we love the most and trust the most. But after all, children are still young and lack social experience and understanding, do not understand the evil in the world, and lack the understanding of money, so they still have to have a certain distance from children in terms of money.
What do you think about this matter, do you think that the parent's responsibility for lax supervision is greater, or the boss's inducement responsibility is greater? #十岁男孩儿花近万元买奥特曼卡片 #
