In his speech at the Ungalacine General Assembly, Obama said U.S.-led economic globalization had reduced the world's extreme poverty by 30 percent. But he did not mention that two-thirds of the people who have been lifted out of poverty are in China. Also

In his speech at the Ungalacine General Assembly, Obama said U.S.-led economic globalization had reduced the world's extreme poverty by 30 percent. But he did not mention that two-thirds of the people who have been lifted out of poverty are in China. There was also a question of poverty, which he would not bring up.

We should admit that the neoliberal economy led by the United States is good for our development. Free trade allows China to get international raw materials at lower prices, and it also does not encounter too high tariff barriers for Chinese manufacturing.

In this sense, Obama owes the United States to the decline in the number of people living in poverty worlds, and he cannot be said to have no reason at all. Of course, he never mentioned that China's contribution to this Spring and Autumn brushwork is very disgraceful.

Another question is: How many poor people does the United States create? For decades, the Cold War, the Middle East War, the Color Revolution... How many people's living standards are pulled below the poverty line?

After the United States took control of Mexican agriculture and food supplies, corn prices plummeted, while tortillas soared. The creation of large numbers of people living in extreme poverty at both the rural and urban ends has turned Mexico into a drug nation.

The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe changed dramatically, and the Eastern European countries almost all went bankrupt overnight. Ukrainians, known for their wealth, had to sell their children and become a major european sex industry.

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Egypt... A country thanks to the United States, from a good life to poverty.

I think if the world could lose the United States, there might have been no extreme poverty population.