laitimes

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang were both powerful courtiers, so why are their historical evaluations completely different?

Sima Yi and Cao Cao are essentially the same, except that Cao Cao's original intention was to make meritorious achievements, and Sima Yi's original intention was to protect himself. This is also related to their origins, after Cao Cao was a eunuch, although the Cao family was also a powerful family, but it had not yet reached the level of a warrior family, Cao Cao had to achieve the progress and prosperity of the family through the sacrifice of his grandfather and his own efforts, so Cao Cao was a person who urgently needed to establish merits among the ruling class. And Sima Yi was born in the Sima clan of Hanoi, a proper first-line top shi clan.

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang were both powerful courtiers, so why are their historical evaluations completely different?

He was a member of the ruling class, so Sima Yi's need was to maintain the prosperity of the family while ensuring his own safety, so that he could achieve a height and status that others could not reach in their lifetime. What's more, Sima Yi was still the second eldest in the family, and he had an older brother on his head who did not have to bear the responsibilities and burdens of a clan like Cao Cao. If it were not for Cao Cao forcing him to Liangshan, Sima Yi would have preferred to be the second ancestor who was not a loser. The success of the Sima family is not only Sima Yi, his younger brother Sima Fu, his son Sima Shi Sima Zhao, which is still relatively famous, the not-so-famous Sima Ling, Sima Jun, and Sima Jingjing are too powerful to be able, they are all capable people, so the Sima family will succeed.

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang were both powerful courtiers, so why are their historical evaluations completely different?

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang faced a different situation, Zhuge Liang had been above ten thousand people in Shu Han since Liu Bei's death, the family was dominant, there were almost no dissidents, Sima Yi faced the Wei Dynasty situation was much more complicated, there were many cattle people, and tianzi was capable, and Sima Yi had to expand his own sexual power and seek self-preservation. Sima Yike had the experience of three ups and three downs, and Zhuge Liang only symbolically degraded himself to the right general, and no one could or dare to marginalize him.

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang were both powerful courtiers, so why are their historical evaluations completely different?

Zhuge Liang did not cultivate his son for a reason, first of all, there was really no chance, when Zhuge Liang died, Zhuge Zhan was only eight years old, it was too young. The second reason is that as long as Zhuge Zhan is unremarkable, he can be safe. Otherwise, even if Liu Chan did not move him, other ministers would push him to the cusp of the storm, but what Zhuge Liang did not expect was that at the time of the life and death of the Shu Kingdom, Zhuge Zhan resolutely and resolutely served him, and in the end he still failed to live a peaceful life. Zhuge Liang's first name was also related to the Later Lord, and before and after his birth, the Lord did his father's deeds to him, and even the political reason for Ge Shi was not surprising, he was indeed capable and loyal or entrusted to the orphan minister. What is rare is that after his death, the Lord's kindness to the Zhuge family was the same. The reason why Huo Guang would be insulted was that Emperor Xuan recognized Huo Guang and killed the Huo family, and the later lord was better to Zhuge Zhan than to his own son.

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang were both powerful courtiers, so why are their historical evaluations completely different?

The Xun family completely lost power after the death of Erxun (荀彧荀攸), and by the time of Sima Shi's reign, they had made a comeback by relying on Erxun (荀顗荀勖). Xun Yan was one of the Eight Dukes of the Western Jin Dynasty. Xun Xun (荀勖) was one of the three carriages of Emperor Wu of the Western Jin Dynasty (司馬攸嘉充 荀勖), who was once Cao Shuang's former official and risked collecting Cao Shuang's corpse, and later became Sima Shuang's confidant. The change of Wei and Jin can also be said to be a counterattack of the Cao Wei Ruying clan camp against the Pei Yuancong camp.

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang were both powerful courtiers, so why are their historical evaluations completely different?

The door valves of the Shi clan were connected to each other and married as in-laws, starting from the Eastern Han Dynasty, and it was biased to hang the Sima clan out. In addition, for the discovery and appointment of talents. Shu Han has always been the first layer of the Jingzhou Sect, the second layer of Liu Zhang's old department in Dongzhou, and the third layer of the native warrior clan in Yizhou. Zhuge Liang's employment of people is also close and distant. Otherwise, Shu Han would not have been unable to control the internal contradictions after Fei Yi's death, or that only Zhuge Liang and his successors Jiang Huan and Fei Yi would have been able to suppress these contradictions while they were still alive. As for the talents appointed by Sima Yi, except for Deng Ai, they were all high-ranking disciples, which was also the inevitable result of Cao Pi's use of the Nine Pins Official's Law and the Shi Clan's trade.

Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang were both powerful courtiers, so why are their historical evaluations completely different?

When the Shu Han Dynasty fell in 263, the native warrior clan of Yizhou, represented by Qiao Zhou, was pleased with the Wei army, otherwise why did the Jiangyou general Ma Mi face the troops of Deng Ai, who was called Hanako, surrender instead of being unable to hold out? If there is no change in Gao Pingling, the evaluation of Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang will basically not be too different, leaving aside the Western Jin Dynasty's pulling crotch and Sima Shi's loss of morality, the change of Gao Pingling is also the highest level of the central coup in the imperial history of 2000.

Read on