There is a sense of safety work - the work of the safety department is not the whole of safety work, on the contrary, the safety department has completed its own work tasks, and it must be able to ensure safety? Think that's right

Safe work has a feeling ——

The work of the security department is not the whole of the safety work, on the contrary, the security department has completed its own work tasks, and it will be able to ensure safety? People who think that this is right must be professional management solidified thinking.

In the actual work of safety management, the solidified thinking of sub-professional management is not OK, some work measures, that is, to ensure quality, but also to ensure safety, for example, do not organize construction problems according to the construction plan, should the safety department manage it? Should the quality department take care of it? How to position the engineering department, the safety department, the quality department, between the three?

From the perspective of human nature, it is basically difficult for the security department to direct the engineering department to do things, because the security department cannot give the engineering department what it wants, and the interests are not equal, that is, to let the engineering personnel listen to the command of the security personnel, which basically does not work.

The security department has only one privilege, mandatory assessment, why should it be assessed by other departments? Because a lot of safety work has to be done by other departments, it just shows that safety work is not the security department's own business.

Therefore, the security department should be clear, just call it the Ministry of Safety Supervision, and other names are not in line with the actual positioning.