Doesn't Apple like to find a cigarette? The result was exactly as its [face covering] wished: Qualcomm and Ericsson unceremoniously slapped the apple with [dog's head] [a flash of inspiration]!
Apple is not a company that does communication technology, and no one expects Apple to contribute to communication technology, iPhone is generous to use Huawei, Ericsson, Qualcomm's patented technology is nothing, just like other mobile phone manufacturers are using, but the problem is that Apple's mentality has always been correct: on the one hand, it uses or wants to use the necessary patents of various communication manufacturers, on the other hand, it is still dissatisfied, accusing others of using "tough means".
Apple thought that if it did not obey, it could be exchanged for Huawei, Ericsson, and Qualcomm to compromise on it, but it did not think that Huawei, Ericsson, and Qualcomm did not compromise and monopolized Apple's various disobedience. Therefore, the expected result came: in the face of Huawei, Apple did not dare to fight, the first to serve soft; in the face of Qualcomm, Apple wanted to fight a war, the result was also soft; in the face of Ericsson, Apple fought again in a war, the result was that the last apple service was soft, and the latest time it is expected that Apple will be soft in addition to serving soft or soft.
Recently, Ericsson has also launched 5G/4G patent infringement lawsuits against Apple in the United States, Brazil, the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, etc., while Apple has only requested the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to stop purchasing Ericsson's communication network equipment in the United States. Look, instead of defending Ericsson's war book with 5G/4G patents (which were not or were not enough to fight at all), Apple sought the protection of Mei Dad's administrative ban. The question is, Ericsson is the object of the United States' efforts rather than suppression, will the United States stop purchasing Ericsson's communication network equipment? The possibilities are negligible. As for the judiciary and its regulators in Brazil, the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium and other countries, we don't see why they are biased toward Apple.
Therefore, for Apple, the communication industry has only one rule left for it: if the suspect's patent fee is high, then don't use other people's patents. Otherwise, it is inevitable to find a loser.
