The mother worries that the child is the heart of the mother, which is enough to explain the status of the child in the mother's heart.
With the rapid development of social economy, people have gradually changed from pursuing marriages formed by material foundations to judging by emotions, so the divorce rate has remained high in recent years. However, who the custody of the child belongs to, and what kind of rights and obligations the child's parents have, although the relevant legal provisions are clearly written, but the phenomenon of competing for children after divorce is often staged, which is shocking.
According to the official video report of Jiangxi Tourism News, a few days ago in a street in the downtown area of Chengdu, Sichuan Province, a suspected divorced woman had different opinions with her mother-in-law for the custody of her infant child, and both sides refused to give in, so a fierce scene of competition for children was staged on the street. The child's mother clasped her hands around the child and wanted her mother-in-law to let go, but how could the mother-in-law let the divorced woman take her granddaughter so easily?
When the two were deadlocked, the woman shouted: "Take your hand away, take it away, why should my child belong to you, want a child, do your dream." ”
When the mother-in-law heard this, she felt as if she had been greatly stimulated, waved her hands like crazy, and pulled the child's legs hard, without any intention of letting go. The dispute between the two and the dialogue of dissatisfaction with each other's behavior have attracted the attention of neighbors and pedestrians, and the focus of the mother-in-law war is the child, so who belongs to the child?
Many people at the scene believe that since the child has been awarded to the mother, as a grandmother, do not be so shameful to scramble, the original divorce is not good to negotiate, do not let the daughter-in-law and the son live a good life, after the scene formed a strange road, and then rob the child, has violated the relevant laws. Even if you want to see the child, you should also get the consent of the child's mother, agree on the place and time to meet, and not see the child's father in the whole process, it is very likely that the mother-in-law will spoil the situation and not let the woman's life after the divorce be too clean.
However, many netizens feel that it must be very difficult for divorced women to live with their children, the children are unattended, and they still need to work to earn money to raise their children, even if the father of the child is willing to give maintenance fees regularly, but these money can really be used on the child, but also a big question mark. It seems that the mother takes care of the child more carefully, but the economic income is low, there is no money, it is not easy to raise the child, in addition, the remarriage of the divorced woman is more harmful to the child, it is better to let the grandmother take it, the parents can go to see the child, and it does not affect the work life of the two, why not enjoy it?
A divorced woman said that the mother-in-law was not qualified to rob the child with the mother of the child, and no one could deprive the mother of the child unless she was willing to give up. Pregnant in October, once delivered, after the birth of the child, the mother basically lost her freedom, every day around the child, others are difficult to really understand the child's mother's feelings, suffering and suffering will not have any complaints. Once swept out of the house, the mother-in-law and daughter-in-law were in the same situation, making them like enemies, which was really sad.
The editor consulted the relevant lawyers and learned that the general child is still young, before the age of two, when the divorce, the court will award the child to the mother, which is conducive to taking care of the child, and can grow up healthily during this time, and after the age of eight, the child has the ability to judge, and who to live with after that, under normal circumstances, the court will seek the child's will to make a decision. The main difficulty is that the raising of children from two to eight years old requires a lot of manpower and financial resources, and who owns the children mainly depends on the property and income of both parties, and the party with more wealth gets the priority right.
The editor believes that since the law gives both parents rights and obligations to the child, although the child is the flesh that falls from the mother's body, it does not mean that the mother has absolute control over the child, not an accessory of the individual, and the mother-in-law and the father play an important role in the growth of the child. The purpose of all people is for the healthy growth of children, and the purpose of all actions is to let children have a good living environment, to provide children with a comfortable living space and learning atmosphere, rather than relying on force to solve problems.
I really hope that both parents of the child can solve the problem amicably, and the rough will only aggravate the contradictions between the two sides, which is not conducive to the growth of the child. Originally, the harm of divorce to the child is difficult to estimate, and it must not be because the problem of raising the child is causing secondary harm to the child.