Last year, a friend told me that a manuscript article or any content can become a hit because it satisfies the reader's narcissism. Although this is not the result of the creator's intuitive pandering.

Last year, a friend told me that a manuscript article or any content can become a hit because it satisfies the reader's narcissism. Although this is not the result of the creator's intuitive pandering.

So, she says, we have to think about how to get the person in front of the screen, while reading someone else's story, to project a part of themselves and get satisfied.

At that time, I did not agree, and I thought in my heart, so as not to satisfy human narcissism.

But lately, I've become more and more aware that she does understand humans better — we're really more narcissistic than we think, and "resonating" is the best option for going along with human nature.

We talk about Gu Ailing, we talk about tragic news, we talk about Huang Zhuang's mother or some controversial figure, word by word, all we want to talk about is our own desires and fears. So much so that this ego is strong enough to obscure the object of conversation itself.

So what a desperate thing.

It's just that we are used to it at the moment.

It seems that we are more and more accustomed to the standard of "resonating", paying attention to details and stories, justifying the short and trivial names of parents, and writing the life stories of artists, writers, and poets who are spotless and not burdened by the world, and are known as character stories.

There is no problem, when demons and ghosts are rampant, at least do not do evil, at least advocate beauty.

But it will also remind you of Luo Dayou's criticism of folk songs:

Wind and Snow Moon

The so-called listener is not so also