[It's a great struggle]
After reading the "association" problem that has been hot on the Internet, I can't help but say something about my opinion. Sima Nanyi's "Lenovo" has been fermenting for 3 months, and it has continued to be hot. Sima Nan's questioning of the "association" issue has aroused the active participation of the vast number of netizens and the people of the whole country, and the focus of the problem is because it involves the loss of state-owned assets, and the loss of state-owned assets is not a matter for a small number of people, it is the interests of the state and the people. This is because state-owned assets were bought with the lives of thousands of revolutionary martyrs, and they were accumulated by the older generation tightening their belts and belts, and they are sacred and inviolable. "Lenovo" executives transferred state-owned assets to private hands through clever plunder, which caused public indignation among the broad masses of the people.
According to common sense, as long as there is a patriotic feeling, a person will safeguard the interests of the state, but some people will find all kinds of excuses and reasons to safeguard the interests of those with vested interests. This is also the fundamental reason why the broad masses of the people support Sima Nan. At the same time, through the exposure of some insiders, the "association" problem has already shown a clear outline. The major issues of right and wrong are very clearly divided among the masses of the people. But some not only do not know how to get lost, but are obsessed.
What is the problem with Lenovo? This is already the obvious lice on the bald man's head. "Lenovo" executives transferred 100 percent of the state-owned holdings controlled by the Chinese Academy of Sciences to private names through clever seizures, and the problem of 80,000 square meters of land in Zhongguancun was lost to state-owned assets. Relying on the golden signboard of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and relying on state procurement to support the development of the company, but the implementation of price double standards at home and abroad, and the money earned from the hands of the Chinese people to the United States, the donation of computers for the US military, 5G voting gate incidents, etc., one by one, have been clearly laid out there.
However, some people have made wild accusations and even vicious attacks on the people who support Sima Nan and oppose the loss of state-owned assets for various reasons. Giant hats are thrown at the heads of those who oppose the loss of state-owned assets. What "opposes reform and opening up," what "cracks down on private entrepreneurs," what private enterprises "original sin," what "hatred of the rich without culture, and so on." In fact, the question of the "association" problem is not to oppose reform and opening up, but to make the reform more in-depth and to make the state-owned enterprises do a good job in invigorating and accounting for more through reform. It is not to crack down on private entrepreneurs, but to let private entrepreneurs get more fair competition. It is not to "hate the rich", but to make the social system more perfect. This involves policy and legal issues, and relevant experts and well-known lawyers have given answers. However, these people are not dead-hearted, and still perform a farce every day on the Internet. Keep this big discussion going on. Originally, the problem is now very clear, but there are still some people who use various excuses to safeguard the vested interests of some people, so it is actually beyond the scope of the discussion of the problem, as the famous literary critic Chen Xianyi said, it is a great struggle.
What is particularly ridiculous is that some people still use the world ranking of "Lenovo", sales volume, etc. to change the topic, but in any case, these cannot hide the fact that a series of illegal crimes such as the loss of state-owned assets cannot be covered up. It cannot be said that you can offset the illegal crimes with the sales volume, and with your world ranking, you can let state-owned assets fall into private pockets at will.
Judging from the great discussion on the "association" issue in the past three months, it shows that it has gone beyond the problem itself, and as Chen Xianyi said, it is a great struggle, which is related to the major right and wrong of the major theories of reform and the big problem of the direction of reform development. It is a struggle to defend the tremendous achievements made through the arduous struggle of several generations since the founding of New China, and it is a struggle to defend our red country, that is, to defend our socialist system. It is also a struggle between peaceful evolution and anti-peaceful evolution, a struggle between skillful plunder and anti-cunning. Therefore, it is a big issue of right and wrong involving major theories. What is particularly ridiculous is that the Tingliu faction has gone so far as to say that the masses of the people are uncultured, but they cannot even figure out such a big right and wrong, and what kind of "culture" are they talking about?
