Recently, Zhongbao Research Institute has sorted out the results of the 85 models tested since the "launch", and probably made a ranking of excellent to poor, which can be described as clear at a glance. Xiaobian selected three models that are not very good to give you an interpretation. There is a reason for choosing these three models.
GAC Trumpchi GS7
The first paragraph to be said is the Trumpchi GS7. What needs to be known is that GS7 is basically not hot now, or the heat is completely inferior to that of Shadow Leopard, M8, GS4, and GS7's recent annual model is also 2019 model, is it that manufacturers do not care much about the market performance of this model?
The GS7 tested by The China Insurance Research Institute is a 2017 model, and the safety of pedestrians outside the car has only received a general M rating, and the positive 25% bias collision that everyone is concerned about has only received a good A rating. In the case of more and more models receiving G excellent ratings, the GS7's achievements are somewhat abrupt and distracting. Moreover, in addition to the 25% bias collision on the front, other items of occupant safety in the car, such as side impact and roof strength, failed to obtain the G excellent rating.
As mentioned earlier, the GS7 has no heat, and perhaps manufacturers have already focused on models that are more likely to become blockbusters.
GAC-Mitsubishi Outlander
Outlander can be described as a "savior" god car, although the sales volume is still not comparable to the mainstream model, but the good villains also let the Mitsubishi brand that is wandering on the edge return to the public's vision. However, perhaps there are more and more excellent products, coupled with mitsubishi's brand power has not improved, even if the product strength is strong enough, it is also weak.
The Eurander tested by China Insurance Research Institute is the 2019 model, and the missing points are all about the safety of the occupants in the car. Among them, the 25% bias collision of the front received a good rating, the side collision received a good rating, the roof strength received a general M rating, and the seat/headrest received a good rating. Overall, outreach's occupants were genuinely not very safe.
Maybe you get what you pay for? The price of Outlander is lower than that of its competitors, but what I did not expect was that the crash test score was barely strong. It is said that Outlander is ready to launch a new generation of models, and I hope that the performance of the new generation will improve.
Zotye T600
The last thing to say is the Zotye T600. The reason why this model is said is mainly because now Zotye has gone bankrupt, and in the past, although Zotye's copycat traces were very serious, it was not worried about selling, probably because it cost 100,000 yuan to get 500,000 yuan to enjoy it!
However, Zhongbao Research Institute revealed the bottom of Zotye. The Zotye T600 tested by China Insurance Research Institute is a 2019 model, and there are no scoring items, almost all of which are lost points. Among them, the front 25% bias collision, roof strength, and seat/headrest all received A good ratings.
Zotye's model is cheap, large, and the configuration is not bad, if combined with the cost performance, this test result may not be so unsatisfactory.
Auto network review: or mainstream models are reliable
By understanding the crash test results and some background of the above three models, do you have an experience, that is, to buy a car or to buy a mainstream car, or the main cart in a brand? Some models themselves are not too important to manufacturers, and the quality may be worse than that of the same door.