To be protected, children need the synergy of parents, society and other subjects to jointly promote value guidance from the perspective of children.
Recently, an Internet celebrity in Hangzhou took a photo in a naked back suspender dress in the community, which caused Bao Mama to worry and was reported. Afterwards, the influencer apologized to the whistleblower and publicly stated that he hoped the public would discuss the topic of photography instead of focusing on her personally. After the incident appeared on the hot search list, it triggered a widespread discussion of dress and education.
According to the owner, there are often Internet celebrities taking pictures in the community, and the situation of clothing exposure does exist. In the environment of freedom of dress, women's clothing style should be given more tolerance, and exposure within a reasonable range belongs to personal freedom and choice. In the news, a woman wearing a yellow suspender is communicating with a photographer, and another staff member helps tie the straps on her bare back. Judging from the social account of the internet celebrity, it only shows its back and there is no suspicion of excessive scale, so it is reported that "taking bad children" is a bit excessive. On the other hand, if you stand in the position of parents, complaints and reports are not unreasonable - the clothing, occupation, lifestyle, etc. of Internet celebrities may have a certain impact on children, and the contradiction between the two parties will arise.
According to the Qianjiang Evening News
However, can such complaints and reports really build a purer world for children? Most of the current reports focus on the dispute between the two subjects of Internet celebrities and Bao Mom, and readers may have difficulty knowing what the protected children think. As netizens joked, "Maybe the child will only think that this sister is wearing too little and worrying about whether it is cold or not." "If we don't start from the child's point of view and only solve the problem according to the parents' habitual way of thinking, we can't help but ask: Does the report protect the child or protect the anxious parent?"
In fact, the curiosity, doubts and other psychology generated by children seeing naked back photos are the opportunity for parents to carry out value education - children can also improve their understanding of the Internet celebrity profession and have a diversified understanding of dressing styles. On the contrary, the method adopted by parents reflects their anxiety about their children's value education. If you lock your child in the greenhouse you built once and for all, and let the value education link be invisibly skipped through complaints, although it can alleviate anxiety to a certain extent, it cannot really solve the problem from the child's point of view.
This matter ended with an internet celebrity apologizing to Bao Ma, but behind such a seemingly "happy" ending, there is still an unresolved value education problem, which does not mean that it can fundamentally maintain the purity of the child's world. To protect children, what is needed is not only a temporary and pure environment, but the synergy of parents, society and other subjects to jointly promote value guidance from the perspective of children. In this sense, although complaints are the rights of parents, complaints cannot completely turn the world into a utopia; only by strengthening and improving educational ideas can we reap results in a longer-term sense.
Author Lv Leyan (junior student of the School of Foreign Chinese, Chinese Min University, this article only represents the author's personal views)
Edited by Guan Li
Red Star Review Submission Email: [email protected]
(Download Red Star News, there are prizes for the newspaper!) ）