laitimes

Glory of kings: From the ice heart of all things to the per capita anti-armor, is the extremely cold storm really ruined?

Hello everyone, I'm Bells~

Recently, when studying a certain hero outfit, I suddenly found that it seems that everyone is not out of the ice heart now, that is, the equipment of the extreme cold storm, which is indeed a surprise to the bells.

Because in the game of Glory of kings, there has always been a saying that everything can be iced, which means that any hero can produce an extremely cold storm, even if it is a mage and a shooter, but this equipment has not been adjusted, and now there are almost no heroes. Instead of the counter-armor, if it was said that everything can be iced, then now it can be said that it is per capita anti-armor.

Glory of kings: From the ice heart of all things to the per capita anti-armor, is the extremely cold storm really ruined?

From an objective point of view, Bell Er analyzed a cause, the reason for the specific change. Many players may say that it is because the anti-armor equipment is too strong, squeezing the appearance rate of the extremely cold storm, if so, it is also true, but the reason behind it is not that the anti-armor is strong.

Because of the Ice Heart, the reason why everything can be produced is not because of how high its defense value is, but because the extreme cold storm equipment has a 20% cooldown reduction effect, which is the highest bonus for a single piece of equipment in the game. And the cooldown of the Glory of Kings is reduced, if you don't count the passive skill of the Cool Boots, the maximum is only 40%, and the Extreme Cold Storm accounts for half of the equipment.

Glory of kings: From the ice heart of all things to the per capita anti-armor, is the extremely cold storm really ruined?

For many heroes who need to be cooled down, ice hearts will not be obsolete in any season, and in fact, many heroes in the game need to be cooled down, such as Yao, such as Arthur and other heroes, in fact, in addition to houyi, which continues to output heroes, the output is mostly from the heroes of ordinary attacks, and the rest of the heroes like to cool down, and the higher the better, because they all use skills to fight damage.

When a hero mainly hits damage through skills, then if there is a cooldown reduction, it is also an indirect increase in damage. But nowadays, whether it is a hero against the road, whether it is a warrior or a tank, or even a mage, almost all of them will rarely come out of the ice heart, and more often choose to fight back, that is, anti-armor, why?

Glory of kings: From the ice heart of all things to the per capita anti-armor, is the extremely cold storm really ruined?

If you compare it from the bonus of these two pieces of equipment alone, the physical defense of anti-armor is not much lower than that of anti-armor, anti-armor is 400 physical defense, ice core is 360 physical defense, the difference is 40, to know that a piece of cloth armor 220 gold coins, physical defense are 90, so the gap is actually very small. Therefore, it is correct to think that anti-armor is more defensive, but choosing anti-armor instead of choosing ice heart must not be because of defense.

In fact, the more important point is the attack, although the ice core has a 20% cooldown reduction, but in terms of offensive ability, the ice core is really not as practical as the anti-armor. Cooldown reduction You need to wait for skills, is it a bonus that takes a long time to have an effect, but let's imagine, now whether you are a single head or a group, how long does it take for a wave to come down? Many times the moment is seconded, it ends in an instant.

Glory of kings: From the ice heart of all things to the per capita anti-armor, is the extremely cold storm really ruined?

Therefore, Bingxin's offensive ability is actually far inferior to that of anti-armor at present, taking the single head as an example. Now the glory of the king is the era of mutual seconds, everyone has a set of skills to second the ability to drop the opponent, whether you are out of the anti-armor or out of the ice heart are the same, this is not wrong.

Then at such a time, the cooling reduction of the ice core is not of much significance. Secondly, the passive of the ice heart will be triggered when the single damage exceeds 10% of the current health, but the damage is only 50+ hero level *10 damage, up to 200 spell damage, and then reduce the opponent's double speed by 30%, is this useful? It's still defensive skills at the end of the day, but it's different when you look at the anti-armor.

Glory of kings: From the ice heart of all things to the per capita anti-armor, is the extremely cold storm really ruined?

The anti-armor itself has 30 physical attacks, while passive is rebound damage and counter-stabbing effects, which are all bonuses to turn defense into offense. Take physical damage, rebound 45% of the damage to the opponent, base 25% + anti-armor 400 physical defense, this is not counting the other physical defense bonus, every 20 physical defense rebound 1%, the highest is 100% rebound damage, not counting the other has 45% physical damage rebound.

In addition, if the physical damage received in 2 seconds exceeds 10% + 1000, the counter-stabbing effect will be triggered, dealing 8% of the maximum health damage to the opponents around you. It looks like a defensive suit, but many times it is higher than the damage bonus of the output suit, which is anti-armor.

In the glory of the king of the current mutual seconds, you have anti-armor, the opponent has an ice heart, and you can't beat the anti-armor at all in the case of single-handedness. And the advantage of anti-armor is that even if you don't fight back, the opponent will be passively hurt, turning the beating into an attack, who do you say to choose?

Glory of kings: From the ice heart of all things to the per capita anti-armor, is the extremely cold storm really ruined?

Read on