laitimes

Glory of kings: Strange, obviously anti-armor passive and shield conflict, why someone will still come out

Text/Jing Haijun

Before I met Lü Bu, I didn't feel strange, but recently I encountered Zhong Wuyan and Zhong Wuyan who had been injured in succession, and my curiosity was hooked after the three-pronged attack.

Obviously, the anti-wounded assassin and the shield hero are in conflict with each other, why is there always someone who will come out like this? Is it that they can't play?

The relationship between the anti-wound thorn armor and the shield

There are so many people who have shields to stab the armor, is there a possibility that the two are not in conflict? Let's test it.

Test one of the anti-wound thorn armor and shield

Glory of kings: Strange, obviously anti-armor passive and shield conflict, why someone will still come out

Let's compare the two damages in the image above:

The first damage is 164, which is in gray; the second damage is 167, which is in the form of red.

What do these two different colors represent? Friends who are familiar with the glory of the king should know. Red represents physical damage, purple represents spell damage, white represents real damage, and gray represents damage absorbed by the shield, which means that as long as the shield is still there, the opponent cannot cause actual damage (whether physical or spell).

Glory of kings: Strange, obviously anti-armor passive and shield conflict, why someone will still come out

Whether it is thorn passive or counter-stab passive, the conditions they trigger are based on physical damage as the medium, and when there is no physical damage, the two passives of the anti-wound thorn armor cannot take effect, and this is the reason why everyone often says that the anti-wound thorn armor and the shield hero clash.

Test two for anti-wound stab armor and shield

Glory of kings: Strange, obviously anti-armor passive and shield conflict, why someone will still come out

Before being equipped with anti-injury stab armor, Sun Shangxiang's damage to Zhang Fei was 164, and after equipping the anti-injury stab armor, Sun Shangxiang's damage to Zhang Fei became 103. Why is this change happening? This brings us to the actual effect of the shield:

When the Shield encounters physical and spell damage, it is equivalent to the hero's extra health, and the hero's own health is not affected until the shield value is consumed. Since the shield is equal to health under certain conditions, it can also enjoy the damage reduction effect of the armor.

Because shields cannot deal physical and spell damage until broken, it is impossible to suck blood through damage.

Through this test, we conclude that the physical defense value of the anti-injury stab armor can increase the hero's physical damage reduction, and after the physical damage reduction ratio is increased, the hero's shield effect becomes better.

Why do heroes with shields need to shoot counter-wounded stab armor?

Through the previous analysis, we roughly know the advantages and disadvantages of shield heroes out of anti-armor, so let's have a good discussion about why some heroes still have anti-armor.

Why lü bu came out of the anti-armor

Glory of kings: Strange, obviously anti-armor passive and shield conflict, why someone will still come out

Why did Lü Bu come out of the anti-armor? I think there may be several reasons:

First of all, Lü Bu is real damage, and any equipment with a physical attack can directly increase his output, and the anti-injury stab armor is no exception (this is an advantage that other heroes do not have).

Secondly, Lü Bu's shield is automatically converted to health, and the anti-armor can save more shield value.

In the end, Lü Bu's output is all close to the body, and after the shield is broken, he can still enjoy the passive effect of anti-injury stab armor.

Why did Liu Bang come out of the anti-armor

Glory of kings: Strange, obviously anti-armor passive and shield conflict, why someone will still come out

Why did Liu Bang come out of the anti-armor? This is to talk about his shield skill, the mechanism of Liu Bang's shield skill is like this:

After using a skill, you can get a shield to generate for 1.5 seconds and then you can choose to release the shield to deal damage if the shield is broken, it cannot deal damage.

Due to the particularity of the skill mechanism, Liu Bang needs physical defense values to improve the anti-damage effect of a skill shield and prevent it from being exploded within 1.5 seconds. Of course, in addition to this, Liu Bang is also a melee hero after all, and the passive anti-armor is also a great improvement for him.

Why did Zhong Wuyan come out of the anti-armor?

Glory of kings: Strange, obviously anti-armor passive and shield conflict, why someone will still come out

Why did Zhong Wuyan want to be anti-A?

First, Zhong Wuyan's shield was provided by the big move, and the frequency of occurrence was not very high.

Second, Zhong Wuyan needs close-up output, and anti-armor can make her safer to approach the target when there is no big move.

Third, anti-armor can make Zhong Wuyan amplify when it needs to be better.

brief summary

There are many heroes with shield skills, such as Zhang Fei, such as Liu Chan, these heroes I do not recommend everyone to counter-injure the stab armor. In fact, through the comparison of these two shield heroes, everyone should also find:

It's not that shield heroes are not suitable for anti-armor, but heroes who don't need to increase damage are not suitable for anti-armor, and those heroes who are originally output are still very good.

I hope that everyone will not form prejudices and develop wrong understandings, which is very important in actual combat. Above, I am Jing Haijun, like the small partner remember to point a point of attention, thank you.

Read on