Someone listed the 9 most popular investment gurus in the world online: Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Jack Borg, Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Burton Marcheer, Charles M. D. Ellis, Sir John Templeton, Peter Lynch.
I looked at the list above and found that at least half of them were parallel goods, most likely not worthy of the name. Why? I think there are only two criteria for judging investment gurus: one is the long-term compound annual return, and the other is the stability of the income.
The first excludes Philip Fisher, Burton Malkill, Charles F. Kennedy, and Charles F. Kennedy. D. Ellis, Jack Borg; and in contrast to the second one, neither Sir John Templeton nor Charlie Munger do not conform. All that's left is Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett and a Peter Lynch. It should be said that these three people do belong to the veritable long-term investment masters, but with their yield and stability, they are far from being called stock gods and stock saints.
Whether it is the Chinese A-share market or Wall Street, there are still many people who have long-term yields and stability than them, but some people do not want to be famous, only want to make a fortune in the market, and act extremely low-key. I think the so-called masters and experts must first and foremost be the big winners of the fearless bulls and bears, whose investment ideas and techniques can cross the bulls and bears, or even create a school of investment trading and can play a mainstay role in the concept. By this standard, Gann and Graham are still unyielding.
![Latin Dance Trivia - Rumba Introduction and Basic Requirements Latin Dance Trivia - Rumba Introduction and Basic Requirements[fig]]()