Is the era of bear children finally coming to an end?
Regarding family education, it has always been an enduring topic of social concern.

On January 1, China's first formal legislation on family education was introduced. The Law of the People's Republic of China on the Promotion of Family Education began to be formally implemented, and since then, family education has risen from "family affairs" to "state affairs".
I believe that everyone has been poisoned by bear children! For some families whose educational philosophy is not completely correct, this can be a headache for them. After all, this means that they now need to raise their babies according to the law, and they can't just expect to send their children to school, to the teacher, to the nanny, and thus to neglect the discipline of the children.
Netizens have great controversy over the purpose of this legislation.
Some people said that children do not want to be brought, but in order to make a living, they have to leave their hometowns, and children naturally become left-behind children.
There are also netizens who leave a message: Who does not want to wife and children hot kangtou! But if you bring your child with you, work conflicts perfectly with the time spent with your child.
Parents of left-behind children said: Put the children in the hometown to let the elderly help bring, the elderly also have things to do, if you take the children to make a living, the cost of living is too high, there is no extra money and energy to take care of the children.
There are also many sober and rational netizens who speak: education is not only a matter of schools, society and the country, but also the proportion of family education is also very important. It is said that parents are the first teachers of teachers, and the family atmosphere has a great impact on the growth of children.
Since you have chosen to give birth to a child, you must be responsible for raising him well and educating him well, and the legislation is not to force you not to work to take the baby, but to help parents understand the importance of family education in the form of law.
More netizens who have carefully read this law have found that in this law, the punishment for parents' incorrect practices only stays at the level of criticism and education and reprimand.
In fact, in the legislative process, the purpose of the legislator is to correct deviations and help parents better carry out family education for parents who refuse to fulfill their family education responsibilities. Therefore, in the subsequent deliberation process, the punishment measures such as fines and detention in the first draft were deleted, and instead of educational criticism, exhortations and stops, and reprimands for parents.
There are also many netizens who quipped: As long as I am not married and infertile, the marriage law and the family education law will "rain me without melon".
Under the change of various policies, Xiaobian believes that this is a manifestation of the increasing perfection of the rule of law society, but Xiaobian is also the idea of unmarried and infertile. But this does not mean anything, maybe this is just the idea of the editor's age, who can say it accurately in the future.
Finally, I would like to mention the other questions that netizens have raised about this matter: "Is there a leave according to law?" Parents take turns to take a break until the child is three years old, so that they can bring their babies according to law. "When can I leave work according to the law?" Otherwise, there is no time to take the child out of school according to the law. "Will there be a legal birth in the future?"
Could it be that in the era before that, it was illegal to take a baby?