GL8 Tank 300 Model Y's latest collision results are out of the GL8 and at the bottom

Just recently, Zhongbao Research Automobile released the test results of 7 models, seven models are Buick Encore S, Toyota C-HR, Dongfeng Citroen Tianyi C5 AIRCROSS, Tank 300, Dongfeng Nissan new X-Trail, Buick GL8 ES Luzun, Tesla Model Y. Six of the models are SUVs, only the Buick GL8 ES Lu Zun is MPV, it is worth mentioning that this is also the second time that the Buick GL8 has boarded the Zhongbao Research Institute.

Buick Encore S

Specifically, Buick Encore S was rated as P in terms of collision resistance and maintenance economy, and the front face structure was not only significantly damaged and deformed in the front-end low-speed structure collision at a speed of 15km per hour, but even the airbags exploded at low speed, which also led to the poor maintenance economy of oncover S, so it was rated as a poor grade.

In terms of passenger safety in the car and the safety of pedestrians outside the car, whether it is a frontal 25% bias collision or a side collision, the character model in the car is not damaged, the roof strength and seat headrest test are also good, and the head and leg tests in the outside pedestrian project, the Oncovey S performance is also relatively excellent, so in these two projects, Oncway S has received an excellent evaluation from G.

In terms of vehicle assistance safety, Oncovi S directly knocked the rider farther away in the AEB VRU test of the pedestrian and cyclist automatic emergency braking system, and its vehicle active safety was worrying, but because of the good performance of other projects, Oncovi was rated as M in vehicle auxiliary safety.

Judging from the test results, the performance of the Encore S can be said to be quite mediocre, and even can be said to be poor, as a hot model of Buick, Buick should improve the Encore S well.

Dongfeng Citroen Tianyi C5 AIRCROSS

Tianyi C5 AIRCROSS was rated M for crash resistance and maintenance economy, that is, good, and its structural crashability was rated as A, serviceability was rated M, maintenance economy was M, and crash compatibility was rated as P. Although the overall rating of this car was rated as M, which is higher than the Encore S, in terms of user protection, the Citroën Tianyi C5AIRCROSS is actually worse.

When testing the occupant safety index in the car, the performance of the Tianyi C5 AIRCROSS is even more worrying. In the frontal 25% bias collision, the main driving airbag of the vehicle slipped sideways, and the side air curtain in the front row was only half, which was not fully protected, and it was extremely prone to A-pillar headshots when the accident occurred.

In the side collision, the rear side air curtain also successfully dodged the head, did not protect the passengers, and was rated A, and at the same time, in the strength of the roof, the vehicle was also rated A, which can be said to be very rare.

In terms of the pedestrian safety index, Tianyi C5 AIRCROSS was rated G, while tianyi C5 AIRCROSS had no data on the vehicle auxiliary safety index.

It is worth mentioning that Tianyi C5 once said that it used submarine-grade materials when it was publicized, but as far as the test results of The China Insurance Research Institute are concerned, the materials and safety of Tianyi C5 AIRCROSS need to be improved, and the submarine-class materials in Citroën's mouth are a bit backward.

Toyota C-HR

Compared with other models, Toyota C-HR is undoubtedly much more niche, but the test of unpopular cars can also play a supervisory role for manufacturers, and C-HR's sister car Yize has also been on the China Insurance Research Institute, and this test can also let consumers know whether Toyota has treated sister cars differently.

In the crash resistance and maintenance economy test, the C-HR has a grade A rating, excellent serviceability, and performs well in low-speed collisions at the front and rear, but the hood is significantly deformed in the full dynamic collision of the front bumper.

Then there were the 25% side-mounted collisions and side-impacts, where the C-HR performed very well, with airbags protecting both the driver and the passenger. In the subsequent pedestrian safety test and vehicle assistance safety test, C-HR also performed well, and all three items received G-rated evaluations.

Tank 300

Great Wall Motors for the safety of the vehicle has always been more important, tank 300 as a hardcore off-road vehicle, its body structure and materials will generally be thicker, the tank 300 in the test results of the research institute is indeed very good, and even in the roof pressure test its results have become the first in the history of the research institute.

First of all, let's look at the crash resistance and maintenance economy, in this piece, Baoyan gave the tank 300 a high rating, and gave A, which was only the tank 300 and Toyota C-HR in the seven models tested this time. And the China Insurance Research Institute also said in the test results released that in the low-speed collision, the tank 300 has the least number of positive encounter defect statistics, only 17, and the tail impact defect statistics are also the fewest, only 4. This shows that the head and tail of the tank 300 are not easily damaged in low-speed collisions, but the tank 300 is lower in terms of maintainability.

In the frontal 25% bias collision and side collision, the tank 300 received a G rating. In the frontal 25% bias collision, there was no significant change in the A-pillar, and the airbags in the car protected the personnel in the car in place. Side impact tank 300 is only the window glass broken, the overall vehicle deformation is very small, the dummy in the car has no obvious damage, it can be seen that the material of the tank 300 is indeed very thick, and the safety of the tank 300 owner is quite guaranteed.

Tank 300 in four tests got the rating of 3G1A, in the strict test of the research can be said to have obtained very good results, in the seven models of the test, the tank 300 as the only domestic car, its results are also among the best, which not only represents the quality of the tank 300 is trustworthy, but also shows that the independent brand car has really risen.

Dongfeng Nissan a new generation of X-Trail

Although the new generation of X-Trail suffered Waterloo because of the sales of three-cylinder engines, there are still many consumers who buy it every month because of its name, so what is the quality of the new generation of X-Trail vehicles?

In terms of impact resistance and maintenance, Qijun only got the M evaluation, and in the front-end low-speed collision, the front hood was seriously deformed and the headlights were damaged. When the rear bumper is fully spacious and dynamic collision, the rear bumper is also significantly damaged.

On the 25% bias collision and side collision, Zhongbao Research Institute gave the Evaluation of Qijun G. In both tests, Qijun's airbags were very good for the protection of dummies, and the door frame and A-pillar of the vehicle were not significantly damaged. In the subsequent pedestrian test and active safety test, Qijun also got the G evaluation.

Overall, the quality of X-Trail is still good, if there is no three-cylinder machine perhaps it will really be a blockbuster model, but unfortunately there is no if.

Buick GL8 ES Lu Zun

This is the second time that buick GL8 has come to Zhongbao Research Institute, the last test results in Zhongbao Research Institute are not ideal, in the frontal 25% bias collision, the vehicle A pillar deformation is serious, the cockpit intrusion is large, and the dummy damage value is high. What about the performance of GL8 ES Lu Zun this time?

Unfortunately, gl8 ES Luzun is the worst performing model among the 7 models tested by China Insurance Research Institute, with a crashworthiness and maintenance economy rating of P grade. In the collision of the front and rear low-speed structures, there was obvious deformation and damage in the front and back, which was extremely impermissible to collisions, and from the picture, you can feel that GL8 ES Lu Zun is like a paper paste.

Then, on the 25% bias collision and side collision, the door of the vehicle has obvious deformation, especially in the side collision, the entire door directly contacted the rear dummy, which is a great safety hazard. At the same time, in the bias collision, the front side airbags were not opened, and more importantly, the vehicle's A-pillar also produced a certain deformation in the collision.

In the subsequent pedestrian safety index, gl8 ES Lu Zun's results were also not satisfactory, only A, although it got a G in the last active safety test.

Overall, GL8 ES Luzun got a lot better results this time than the last time, but such results are difficult to satisfy consumers, and at the same time, they are not enough to see in front of other models. Although there are reasons why MPV is inherently weaker than SUVs in terms of safety, in the eyes of the travel bureau, it is more because there are certain problems in the architecture of GL8, and now independent brands are strongly entering the MPV market, and Buick wants to be a long snack.

Tesla Model Y

The Tesla Model Y received the lowest score in the first big category, Crashworthiness and Maintenance Economy, not because of its poor construction and crash compatibility. In the front and rear collisions, none of the Front and Rear ends of the Model Y were significantly deformed or damaged, mainly because its serviceability and repair economy were too poor, resulting in its first major score of only P.

In terms of occupant safety testing in the car, Model Y got a G rating, and the A-pillar structure of the front 25% bias collision vehicle structure remained well, and the airbags in the car also played a significant protection for dummies. In the side collision, the Model Y also has a good protection for the passengers in the front and rear rows of the car.

It is worth mentioning that in the final active safety test project for the rider's automatic emergency braking system test, the Tesla Model Y score is not high, only 46 points, while Toyota's C-HR scored 54 points in this project.