Man Ge hates the title party the most, yesterday his old friend Ah Qiang sent a photo album, named "Japanese Tight Uniform Seduction Photo Album". Maybe the melon-eating masses have guessed what it is.
But the simple brother is not afraid to speculate on his old friend with the worst malice, so he still clicks with anticipation. Sure enough, it was still too simple.
On this day, Man Ge saw another headline: The latest 85 car crash results of China Insurance Research Institute were announced. Wow, how many days of overtime is added to the research institute, and 85 cars are tested at once. Click in to take a look, only to know that the latest phase of China Insurance Research Institute only hit 7 cars, the so-called 85 cars are together with the previously tested models. This title has achieved a real level. Let's not say anything, just look at the latest issue of zhongbao research research hit which 7 cars. (Ps: 85 cars at the end of the article)
Buick Encore S
Among the 7 cars, there are 6 joint ventures and 1 independent, and Buick has two cars tested. First of all, Buick Encore S, the action of the Central Insurance Research Institute is still quite slow, and the 2020 model that has been tested here is still discontinued. But it doesn't matter, the general architecture material has not changed. Judging from the results, Oncovi S is still good. The driver's side front 25% bias collision, side impact, roof strength, and headrest seat items were all rated as excellent (G). The pedestrian protection project scored 66% and the evaluation was excellent.
In terms of auxiliary safety, the vehicle headlamp score was less, which lowered the score and only received a general (M) evaluation. In terms of maintenance economy, the performance is poor. Previously, China Insurance Research Institute took the 2018 model of Oncovy to test, the main driver 25% bias collision score is average (M), side impact score is good (A). So oncovi S's performance this time has improved a lot.
Buick GL8ES Lu Zun
The 2017 Buick GL8 was also already in the 2018 crash test list of The China Insurance Research Institute, and the results obtained at that time were not very satisfactory, only the seat headrest and auxiliary safety scored excellently. This time, the 2022 GL8ES Luzun model has also improved its performance. Roof strength, headrests, and auxiliary safety ratings are all excellent.
In the 25% bias collision and side collision test of the main car, GL8ES Lu Zun received a good evaluation (A). For MPV models, weak crash safety performance is almost a common problem, and it is not bad to be able to achieve the A evaluation. In terms of crash resistance and maintenance economic index, this high-end MPV of nearly 400,000 yuan is expected to be a poor (P) level.
Nissan X-Trail
The model that Qijun once sold so well was only hit by The China Insurance Research Institute for the first time after the replacement. Judging from the results, The New Qijun is outstanding in all aspects, saving a little face for its dismal sales. Several pressure items such as 25% bias collision, side impact, and roof strength on the driver's side are excellent (G), and the performance of pedestrian protection and auxiliary safety is also G.
However, in terms of the collision resistance and maintenance economic index with rare high scores, New Qijun only received a general (M) evaluation. Breakdown into structural impact resistance is reliable, but serviceability and maintenance economy are average, pulling down the score for this item.
Toyota C-HR
Another Japanese car, the Toyota C-HR, has achieved good scores thanks to the stable performance of this TNGA architecture. The driver's side front 25% bias collision, side impact, roof strength, and headrest seat items were all rated as excellent (G), and the scoring rate in pedestrian protection and auxiliary safety was slightly lower than that of Nissan Sunkijun, but it also reached an excellent level.
Better than The New Qijun, C-HR achieved a good (A) rating in the Crashworthiness and Maintenance Economy Index. The Toyota C-HR and its sister model Yize are known as "road tanks" and have been proven by "actual combat". And Toyota Yize was also hit by the Zhongbao Research Institute in 2020, and the evaluation of each item is the same as that of C-HR, which shows that the quality is very stable.
Citroën C5AIRCROSS
Last year, Citroen won a lot of sound with versailles C5X, and Zhongbao Research Institute did not rub the heat to test the new car, but measured the Tianyi C5AIRCROSS that has not been replaced for 5 years, and I don't know what the car selection logic of Zhongbao Research Institute is. And this time is also citroën's products in the first test of the China Insurance Research Institute, the results are not particularly good, not bad, it is a warning hum. The only items that received excellent (G) evaluations were seat headrests and pedestrian safety.
The 25% bias collision, side impact and roof strength of the main driver were rated as good (A). The Crashworthiness and Maintenance Economics Index is rated as average (M), mainly due to poor crash compatibility. The meaning of collision compatibility is simply the degree of damage between two vehicles colliding and the vehicles of both sides. In addition, since the first test model did not have a safety auxiliary configuration, this item was omitted.
Tesla Model Y
Tesla is very enthusiastic on the test list of the China Insurance Research Institute, two years earlier the Model 3 has been hit, the body safety is quite good. ModelY also performed well this time, and received excellent (G) evaluations for various aspects of body crash safety, pedestrian protection, and safety assistance. So don't be too nervous about braking or not braking, you may be worried about battery safety better.
But well, ModelY cried when it was repaired. The Crashworthiness and Maintenance Economics Index received a bad rating from the China Insurance Research Institute, which means that it is difficult to repair and the maintenance cost is high. This is not unrelated to its one-piece die-casting technology, which saves time and cost for Tesla, but when repairing, it is passed on to the owner.
Tank 300
The last car, the only self-owned brand model, the Tank 300. In this phase of the test, and even in the total of 85 test models of the China Insurance Research Institute, the tank 300 is the existence of highlights. With the exception of the Crashworthiness and Maintenance Economics Index, which was rated good (A), the rest of the items were all excellent (G) ratings. The name tank certainly does not deceive people.
In several projects of the crash test of China Insurance Research Institute, the collision resistance and maintenance economy are notoriously strict, and the G evaluation is very rare. Looking at the 85 tested cars of The China Insurance Research Institute, only the Volkswagen ID.4X, Maiteng and Skoda Kodiak three cars got the G, and Volkswagen cheated.
Combining the scores of various achievements, the Tank 300 also surpassed the Mazda CX-30 and Mercedes-Benz GLC in 85 test cars, and reached the top of the domineering. Can't help but sigh a word of domestic light! Coupled with the recent announcement by the Great Wall that the tank 300 will be temporarily suspended, the second-hand tank 300 does not know how much to increase the price?
The picture source of this article | invasion and deletion of the network
Remember to "like, watch, share" three times oh ~ ~ ~