Hello fellow students!
Now start answering 4 from
Questions from previous "Brother Yin Mo Answer" messages
Q1 : Why would you want to build a full-size SUV? Are there many people in China who need full-size SUVs? The ideal L9 officially said that the price is 450,000-500,000, Ande thinks it can still be as successful as | the ideal ONE? 01:05-05:24
Q2: I have tried Song PLUS DM-i twice before going to the 4S store, and I feel that there is obvious vibration in the backrest of the rear seat, is this one bought by Brother Yin solved? | 05:25-08:04
Q3: Is the product strength of Changan UNI-K iDD cost-effective compared to its pricing of 170,000 | or 80,000? 08:05-10:06
Q4: Recently, many electric vehicles have also begun to increase in price because of lithium ore prices, will electric vehicles become more and more expensive in the future? Just like gasoline is getting more and more expensive| 10:07-12:01
Q5: I heard that the recent TOP ORDERs of ET7 are very expensive, should manufacturers stop this scalping behavior through the real-name system |? 12:02-13:56
Q1: Why would you want to build a full-size SUV? Are there many people in China who need full-size SUVs? Ideal L9 officially said that the price is 450,000-500,000, Yin Ge thinks it can still be as successful as the ideal ONE?
The price is much higher than many people expected before, so whether it can succeed depends on the definition: if it is from the perspective of the rising premium of the ideal brand, the L9 car will definitely be successful and will get a certain amount of sales; but if it is a sign of success or not, its sales will certainly not reach the level of ONE. (Before the earliest so-called news is expected to be within 400,000, or even 36-37 million or so, that is really possible to replace ONE as the main sales)
The ideal ONE car verifies a lot of things: [1] Whether the large size, SUV that tends to MPV style can get enough users in the home positioning. [2] Due to the limitation of vehicle weight, engine efficiency, and range extender structure, whether the relatively high-speed fuel consumption users can accept it, and the endurance of more than 100 kilometers of 40-degree battery is just right. [3] The significance of practical family intelligence can be seen in the L9: the battery capacity has not risen sharply, the overall size has become larger, the OLED front and rear screens with higher brightness, and the design of the head-up display with the steering wheel bar screen are all very correct evolutions. And the space problem of the third row of seats before, it is also very promising to be properly solved.
The problem of the ideal ONE can be seen from many cases, and the consideration of the "redundancy performance" of mechanical components is very limited, which I guess the L9 will not improve. Can be stuck on the edge of the limit to travel, cost, weight, strength, slightly enough to use, in line with the ideal of the current model of consistent positioning, do not take what limit crossing and no man's land, this car is high ground clearance, there is a certain four-wheel drive capability of the super MPV...
Q2: I have tried Song PLUS DM-i twice before going to the 4S store, and I feel that there is obvious vibration in the back seat back, is this one bought by Brother Yin solved?
I've just been driving for a week now, about 300 kilometers, because I've been driving myself and I don't have the chance to sit in the back row. At that time, when I went to the test drive, I did not sit in the back seat, and this problem really touched the blind spot. I will have a good experience next week, but it must be noted that in terms of the difference between the actual sound insulation performance of Song PLUS DM-i and the feedback on the Internet, I am somewhat inclined to think that this kind of problem may be mostly psychological factors...
Q3: Is the product strength of Changan UNI-K iDD cost-effective compared to its pricing of 170,000 or 80,000?
From the pricing point of view is quite competitive, good luck this car is the same level as Tang, the battery capacity is also larger. Although because of the overall three-electric efficiency, the actual pure electric endurance is not much more than Tang DM-i, but the price is indeed much cheaper. Especially in the version of 170,000, most of the basic configurations are also available, and the difference is more obvious. These PHEV models are also currently exempt from purchase tax, which can actually be understood as just a 160,000 car... At present, it seems that the acceleration should not be as fast as the official target, but the fuel consumption has seen some media reviews, which is indeed not high, and this P2 hybrid Changan play is very slippery.
Of course, this car from another point of view, although the size is large but does not provide a third row, this will lose some of the people who have requirements for multi-person rides. In addition, after all, this is a new thing, and the consumer's wait-and-see and hesitant mentality will also suffer a lot more than BYD, which is now in the sky.
Q4: Recently, many electric vehicles have also begun to increase in price because of lithium ore prices, will electric vehicles become more and more expensive in the future? It's like gasoline is getting more expensive
Not only the price of raw materials, but also multiple factors such as subsidies. Of course, manufacturers will also choose other battery technology routes and other ways to avoid huge changes in prices, but a certain degree of upward trend is foreseeable. However, compared with the previous electric vehicles, the new vehicles now have signs of improvement in terms of charging convenience, endurance, and even future residual value.
At present, if electric vehicles have private charging conditions, the cost per kilometer of electricity consumption can be calculated in points, if electric vehicles really have an impact on the local grid load, then the electricity price in the corresponding areas during the peak period of electricity consumption will also rise more, which can be basically determined.
Q5: I heard that the recent TOP ORDERs of ET7 are very expensive, should manufacturers stop this scalping behavior through the real-name system?
Whether the real-name system is a problem, the reasons why manufacturers have concerns are probably as follows: First, the order conversion rate, if it can be transferred, then the owner of the car who orders the car regrets that it can be directly converted to the effective order of other users, but if the strict real-name system is not converted, then the order may be lost; it can facilitate the transfer of orders or even make a little profit, and will also encourage more people to go forward to place orders, which is obviously a good thing for manufacturers.
Second, the real name of the car will also make consumers worry more, such as the city with strict restrictions on the indicators, originally I used my ID card to book a car, and as a result, when I want to pick up the car after half a year, I hope to use a friend's or the company's license plate, which is very troublesome. There is also a third point, of course, is the problem of index borrowing or other family indicators, etc., although the current implementation of the real-name system of manufacturers will have a certain degree of flexibility, but there is room for flexibility. Other factors are not taken into account here, such as the existence of scalpers and congestion that will make dealers profitable, and the "benign hunger and thirst" of vehicles that exceed supply.
In short, the idea of strictly implementing the real-name system of lock ID cards from the earliest booking stage to eliminate scalper behavior is very good, but from the perspective of vehicle sales, it may be contrary to the interests of manufacturers...
Well, this issue of Yin Ge Mo Mo answered to this end, welcome to continue to ask questions in the WeChat comment area! We'll see you next time, bye-bye!
Click to patronize the Radish Cooperative