After Li Xiang's "slip of the tongue", the Weibo of this front car radar was no longer visible

This afternoon, Li Xiang forwarded a Weibo that spit on the radar of the ideal car, and quickly detonated the Weibo public opinion field, becoming one of the hot topics this afternoon.

The general background of the incident is that an ideal car owner reported that the ideal had a safety hazard, because its radar did not indicate the obstacles ahead when driving at a low speed of 5km/h, resulting in a crash.

Perhaps because V@ Chen Zhen forwarded this Weibo and gave his own explanation, Li Xiang suddenly "directly confronted the line" at 3 p.m. and commented:

"D gear is driving normally, the 12 ultrasonic radars detected by 360 are not working, if D gear is also working, as long as it is a normal person, it will go crazy, and the urban area is alarming 80% of the time." When the city NOA is enabled, the network occupied by BEV can be detected with a high probability. This thing and stationary objects such as guardrails are not interfered with by humans themselves when they drive and detect them, because they do not know the driver's intention and trajectory."

But it was this "professional" explanation that quickly detonated the Internet and even triggered a "scolding war".

Let's take a look at the causes and consequences.

In fact, @阿刀冬児_'s "complaining" Weibo was posted a few days ago, and the first sentence at the beginning does seem to be a bit "top": ideal cars have major safety risks! Attention to all ideal car owners and family and friends who are considering the ideal car!!

As for why he complained, you can see this Weibo screenshot.

From what he described, it was he who hit a stone pier while driving his ideal car to a slow right turn, but the radar did not give any warning. He even confirmed in the comments section that the radar was not alerted and added information about the configuration of the vehicle he was driving:

"I received feedback from the 4S store in the morning: After the background data query, the radar did not have any warning prompts. I ideal L7max, car ultrasonic radar, millimeter wave radar, and because it is a top configuration, it also adds 40,000 equipped with a lidar. Now it is said that these radars that were paid for cannot even detect a row of 3 knee-high stone piers. What are you doing with these radars?"

Realistically speaking, before Li Xiang forwarded the comment on this Weibo, @阿刀冬児_ already had a "fall" situation in the comment area. The top-ranked reviews are roughly as follows:

"I thought this major safety hazard was something, but I didn't expect that this hidden danger was the driver himself..."

"Seriously, this kind of recognition is very normal, don't just think about the car, otherwise why do you want people to drive."

"Acknowledging your own food is a very basic quality as a driver."

"You can't go to college, it's all to blame for ideals"

To sum it up quickly: @阿刀冬児_ is vexatious.

These remarks occupy the front row of the comment area, almost one-sided, and only by clicking on the middle of the building or climbing down, can you see some different views that there is a problem with the radar of the ideal car.

And @ADao Dongyu_ also replied in the comment area: "The accident determination is one question, and why the radar does not prompt is another." I'm talking about the second question."

It is this second problem that leads to the big V @陈震同学. Someone @ asked Chen Zhen, and he forwarded the response: indicating that his Cullinan had also bumped in.

Chen Zhen's Weibo attracted Li Xiang's follow-up, which triggered a heated discussion in the afternoon.

Although Li Xiang quickly deleted his Weibo, screenshots were already flying all over the sky, and the controversy not only continued, but intensified, pushing the incident to a climax, and various KOLs also came to an end.

Even netizens turned out @Liji's Weibo that previously evaluated the three CEOs of Wei Xiaoli, sighing that they predicted accurately.

"The owner of the ideal car had an accident, Li Xiang thought that he was wronged and went up directly, straightforward, the blogger big V rushed up, and then I saw that the owner was so scared that typing was unfavorable, and he said that the ideal is a good car."

Back to the point, after Li Xiang posted Weibo, @ Special Jianer said when forwarding: "All cars of NIO NT2 are working ultrasonic radar under D block, and false alarms will exist, but it is estimated that less than 5%, 80% This performance is too poor."

After this comment, more netizens came forward to say that their car can identify obstacles by radar at low speed in D gear, and there are even many traditional oil vehicles.

@崔啸-Big Butler said: "I have a Kia oil-burning MPV on hand, and when driving slowly at low speed, the front ultrasonic radar works to display the distance to the vehicle or obstacle in front, and automatically turns on the front camera video on the central control screen. This is still the case with oil cars, not to mention that you call yourself a smart car."

As of about 9:50 p.m. tonight, 164 people have voted, of which 142 chose "Hui", accounting for about 87%.

Some of the words are quite harsh: "Car companies brag about how smart they are, but they don't want to admit any mistakes." Directly deduce that the radar does not work, and the Internet explodes the owner, this is very the king of Weibo."

There are also explanations, after all, people are not sages: "Don't be embarrassed for him if there is a technical problem"

The @electric box principal, who was named before, said: "Let's do it with peace of mind to make a color TV refrigerator big sofa~~~"

However, just as we decided to record the incident, around 7:25 p.m., @阿刀冬児_'s original Weibo was also deleted. This also means that the main Weibo posts directly related to the incident are nowhere to be found, and the debate may soon subside.

Interestingly, Li Xiang's current Weibo first article is: "Whether it is praise or scolding, it can effectively increase sales."

As the most active CEO in the car circle, Li Xiang often expresses his views on products on Weibo, so is this "overturning" or "people are not sages"?

(End)