Do you really have to pay taxes if you don't have children? Is it really the future not just to be single and guilty, but to be single and pay taxes? Recently, economist Ren Zeping publicly suggested that a fertility encouragement fund should be established as soon as possible

Do you really have to pay taxes if you don't have children? Is it really the future not just to be single and guilty, but to be single and pay taxes? Recently, economist Ren Zeping publicly suggested that a fertility encouragement fund should be established as soon as possible, and the central bank should print an additional 2 trillion yuan and give birth to 50 million more children in ten years. He stressed that he said that this method was the most pragmatic and effective at present. This remark has also triggered heated discussion among netizens, some people say that this economist is probably taught by a physical education teacher, if anything can be solved with more money, then what else do economic talents do? Isn't it over without money? Of course, some people think that this matter, ah, is it easy to understand, printing money to subsidize childbirth, in fact, ah, in essence, is it a kind of behavior like a person who does not have children to collect taxes and then give birth subsidies? So is this disguised tax collection behavior useful? Let's take a look at Singapore's global birth subsidy is high, then this little money in our country, compared to those countries in Singapore, the total number is small, the details are poor, and there is a lack of implementation. But you will find that Singapore and other countries, as countries that have already tried all kinds of stimulus and punishment, have long told everyone. None of these methods may be of much use, but is it really just because there is no money? Are housing prices and education the reason? Probably, but rest assured, he may not even be one of the most decisive reasons. Income, education, fear of pressure on future generations, fear of development, fear of responsibility, pursuit of personal career and life, etc., are not just a matter of money. Of course, the above I am talking about only the post-70s and post-80s, so what about the post-90s and post-zero? It is not only a problem of fertility, it is obvious that there have been problems since the beginning of marriage, but the concept of marriage and values have undergone fundamental changes, so what is the use of stimulating fertility? So you will find that after our fertility incentive policy came out a few years ago, it almost did not play any stimulating role for the post-90s generation, which is already a reality. Finally, I would like to say that the low fertility rate is an inevitable trend in the development of social industrialization, and it is really unrealistic to rely on money alone.