Manslaughter 2's Father's Love and The Wrath of the Underworld

#误杀2 #

Rushed to Xiao Yang to watch the movie "Manslaughter 2".

The plot remake is "Imminent" (also translated as Angry Father) starring Denzel Washington, which first describes the poor and happy life of the low-level people, and then is dragged into the "violent anger" mode by the son's sudden heart attack that cannot be cured.

Xiao Yang was eventually "killed by mistake" and used his heart to save his son.

Different from the relatively reunited ending of Denzel Washington's version, the relevant film and television character settings, the plot of failing to take the normal channels to save the son as desired, etc. have been adjusted, and finally the father's life has been exchanged for the continuation of the son's life.

Xiao Yang was shot, and someone had to take responsibility.

Is the doctor wrong? He was also doing his best to help Xiao Yang find a way, and gave him an extra hour to raise money, and he also argued with reason when his heart was "cut off" by the director, but in the end he could only compromise reality and execute according to the order.

Is that the director wrong? It seems impossible to say, if the top secretary calls him to ask for the heart, what will happen if he refuses? Moreover, according to the prescribed time, Xiao Yang really did not prepare for the operation cost.

The operation fee was not paid after the stipulated time.

It just so happens that the relevant leaders are in urgent need of heart life, give or not give? It is estimated that anyone in this position has no way to refuse, not to violate the relevant process regulations, and can also protect themselves, as long as they are not saints should do so?

The mayor "stole" the heart in order to save his son.

In order to protect his son, Xiao Yang tried to find a way to settle accounts with the "person who stole the heart", and the fathers were making sacrifices and efforts for the sake of his son's life, as if there was no way to accuse them of doing wrong? Regardless of identity blessings, it is a deep fatherly love.

That secretary, it is his job to solve the leadership problem.

The leader did not ask him to grab the heart, he knew that the leader urgently needed the heart to save his son's life, just he also had the channels and methods to get it done, it was very "professional ethics quietly" to help the leader get things done, it seems to be very dedicated and competent?

While it's not wrong to help the leader with the relevant matters.

But colluding with organ trading organizations was indeed a crime, so it was eventually netted. The mayor also "did not instruct" the secretary-general to kill and plant stolen goods, let alone participate in any part of the entire criminal series process, completely "unaware".

Who is wrong? Who won again?

The catch of the catch, the death of the dead, the scattering of the scattered... It seems that they have all lost, only the mayor seems to have lost anything, and he does not seem to be wrong in the legal process, but he is "morally reviled and worried about his career prospects"?

Xiao Yang held the gun and said with tears in his eyes: "We are honest and honest people, why are you always winning?" We can swallow our anger for the sake of life, we can live humbly for the sake of life, but you can't trample us to death like bugs! ”

Fortunately, the story told in the movie takes place in Thailand.