Wen 丨 Cao Jingming
Title 丨 "flattering" type professor: Rich people even lend usury is benevolent, and poor parents are scolded when they die
Welcome to leave comments and exchange views on the cow ghost snake god!
In the previous article, the author shared with you the behavior characteristics of the "price increase" type expert professors, and in this article, the author will continue to work hard and continue to summarize with you another type of expert professor - the flattering type.
Before formally analyzing this type of expert professor, the author first came to share with you a point of view from the reader of the comment section of the previous "price increase" type expert professor article, saying that the expert professors who are now crisscrossing the network are no different from the keyboard man, except that one is a black hand hidden behind the network, and the other is a senior intellectual cloaked in cultural clothing.
This is a very interesting point of view, I don't know how everyone understands it, anyway, the author personally still quite agrees.
So the question is, what is a "flattering" type of expert professor? As the name suggests, it is deliberately pleasing some people, to be precise, there is deliberately currying favor with the rich, stepping on the poor, in order to be able to eat the dividends of traffic, it is simply unscrupulous, shameless, but it is indeed another shortcut to "success" and "money".
One of the typical figures is the famous economist and Professor Wang Fuzhong of the Central University of Finance and Economics.
Professor Wang Fuzhong, in a lecture, openly said that people who lend usury are the most benevolent and can help the poor to save the emergency, and even use a well-known story to give an example, saying that Huang Shiren, who lent Yang Bailao money, is the most benevolent and loves to help people, and everyone has learned to try to understand what a rich person who is willing to lend money to the desperate poor is a noble character, and it is not too much to be a living bodhisattva.
Professor Wang Fuzhong's point of view has to be dialectical, if it is true that according to what he said, a rich man who is willing to help the poor and save the emergency must be the heart of a bodhisattva. But the problem is that when Huang Shiren lent Yang Bailao money, he did not lend it to Yang Bailao for no reason, but took Yang Bailao's daughter Xi'er as collateral.
What do you mean? I'm afraid that in Huang Shiren's mind, I still wish that Yang Bailao would not be able to pay back the money, so that he could directly use abnormal means to hold the beauty back. This is a kind of calculation, but also a kind of snake and scorpion heart, not as great as Professor Wang Fuzhong said, full of chickens and dogs.
On the contrary, Professor Wang Fuzhong also made another point of view specifically aimed at the poor, saying that the poor do not have the slightest morality and integrity to speak of. Professor Wang Fuzhong gave a very shocking example, saying that in poor families now, especially after the death of their parents, their children will turn their faces because of some money and money, and they will not miss family affection at all.
First of all, the author does not deny that there is indeed an objective situation given by Professor Wang Fuzhong, but this situation is not only in poor families, that is, the current TV series do not shoot the dog blood plot between the giants, they have begun to engage in what IP, if this is placed in the Hong Kong films of the 1990s, how many such giants are competing for inheritance? During this period, the dirty tricks were no less than those of the poor families, or even more so.
Whether it is a rich person or a poor person, whether you can move your heart in the face of the temptation of huge amounts of money does not depend on the amount of your own wealth, but the factors of character character and comprehensive quality are affected.
So the question is, why does Professor Wang Fuzhong not see the tearing between the giants, because of the inheritance of the matter, only see the accidental confrontation between the poor? Is it such a simple truth that Professor Wang Fuzhong would not know? Poor people even after the death of their own parents, they have to be scolded, what is the reason for this? Or is it that Professor Wang Fuzhong deliberately said this, and what is its purpose?
Compared with Professor Wang Fuzhong's remarks in the article praising rich people, even usury is the most benevolent, which shows to what extent this person has been flattered? Even if it is the same thing, as long as it happens to the rich, it is not a sin, even the shortcomings can be washed white; but if it is placed on the poor, it is another thing entirely, even the breathing is wrong.
This is the typical discrimination, there is nothing to justify, there is no need for any justification, things are already very clear.
In addition to Professor Wang Fuzhong, there is also Professor Lin Caiyi of Shanghai Fudan University, who has also made similar remarks, in order to please the rich people in China, he actually dares to call on the poor to spend all their money, on the grounds that the export business is not easy to do now, and it is very ridiculous to support domestic production.
The author can also understand and even support domestic things. But if you use the way to spend all the money to support domestic production, is there a situation that is too late? Moreover, if you support domestic production, there is no need to support it! Moreover, those capitalists are not selling their businesses and producing products at zero profit.
In the final analysis, Professor Lin Caiyi's view is still to fool the poor to create profits for the rich, and the final result is nothing more than to make ordinary people fall into the moonlight family, make the rich rich richer, and let the wealth flow into the hands of a very small number of people.
With such a proposal, it is difficult not to let the author wonder what Professor Lin Caiyi's motives are and whether he has malicious intentions. After all, during the epidemic period, it has been able to prove a lot of problems, if everyone in the daily life, there is no habit of financial management, and when it is really urgent, how to maintain life? I have a friend before, because of the suspension of work for half a year during the epidemic, resulting in having to sell cars to repay various loans.
When that time comes, how should those who listen to Professor Lin Caiyi's views maintain their own lives? Did you go to Professor Lin Caiyi for money?
Moreover, as the proposer of the viewpoint, does Professor Lin Caiyi really have the specific content of the viewpoint? Have you zeroed out your bank card balance? At least the author personally does not believe that Professor Lin Caiyi can lead by example.
The author is self-nominated
1) Zhu Ziqing's "Back Shadow" father violated traffic rules? Professor: It will bring bad students and should be removed from the textbook
2) Professor Chen Ping, who "lives in an American villa and shouts that I love China", earns yuan and exchanges it for US dollars
3) How do male professors interview female students? "Chest, face, ass, legs" is the standard, what to study
4) Allows "professors" to have multiple spouses? Being intimidated to "seek welfare", response: to find a post-00s little girlfriend
5) Are house prices really high? Professor: Not being able to afford a house is your problem! Intimidated by "600 million people earning 1,000 yuan a month"
This article is [Cao Jingming] original, picture source network! #Brick Home ##教授 #