laitimes

Is the 1.5T new Sagitar worth waiting, or is it more cost-effective to start with 1.4T?

Is the 1.5T new Sagitar worth waiting, or is it more cost-effective to start with 1.4T?

Hello teacher, is it worth waiting for the 1.5T new Sagitar to evaluate, or is it more cost-effective to start with 1.4T? Within 15w, Sagitar, Xingrui, Civic, second-tier cities commuting home, from the after-sales maintenance point of view more recommended which one?

A- In fact, the dynamic experience of the 1.4T+ DSG active in the public can not be faulted, easy to open, easy to get started, if the cash has a certain discount, there is really no need to wait for the 1.5T version.

The problem is that Volkswagen 1.4T shouldn't be around from 2020 onwards, with slow iterations and pure disgusting people. Compared with the same price model, in theory, DSG dry dual-clutch heat dissipation and durability is always not as good as wet dual-clutch or CVT, and Sagitar as always to drink No. 95, maintenance compared to The Japanese or domestic is also more expensive, the overall cost of the later car or Civic has more advantages, the advantages of Xingrui are strong materials, high configuration, and better luxury experience.

Is the 1.5T new Sagitar worth waiting, or is it more cost-effective to start with 1.4T?

Old fans have asked questions again: Toyota TNGA new platform architecture under the RAV4 driving texture is good, but personal feelings that the cost performance is not outstanding, for example, 2.0L times low-end fashion model naked car to about 190,000, in contrast, Mazda CX5 2.5 four-wheel drive naked car but more than 200,000, in this case Toyota what advantages? In addition, there is a question: Lynk & Co 01 and XC40 have the same origin, XC40 T4 fashion naked car price has been able to explore to about 22, the configuration is enough, Lynk & Co 01 is also 2.0T four-wheel drive, the price of naked car is almost 20, in this case, the gap of 2W Where do you think it is? Is it worth it? I also hope that the teacher will solve the puzzle

The cost performance of A-RAV4 is not outstanding or need to be said? Compared with the same level of models, this car seems to be well known, compared to the CX-5's advantages are mainly better space experience; the same as 2.0L, RAV4 economy may also have a little advantage. For normal home use, the CX-5 is indeed more cost-effective, and it does not need 2.5L four-wheel drive, buying a 2.0L front drive is enough.

Lynk & Co and Volvo are not comparable, the latter is said to be the second line, that is also a luxury brand, this car logo alone is enough to make many young ladies flock to it, this aspect makes no sense, the same reason Audi A3 will be more expensive than golf. Of course, from the perspective of the market, between Lynk & Co 01 and XC40, there are still quite a few who choose the former.

Is the 1.5T new Sagitar worth waiting, or is it more cost-effective to start with 1.4T?

How about hoshikoshi L's household use? On the weekend, I went to see that I can only buy medium and high-end models now, landing at least 18, what else is worth recommending in the same price range?

A-Star Yue L's fuel consumption is slightly higher, maintenance costs are slightly more expensive, and other aspects are very prominent in the same level of products within 200,000, with high configuration, good comfort, strong power and good quality. At this price, you can also choose joint venture SUVs such as Oncovi and Tuyue, but the configuration is not high, and the power is not as good as the Star Yue L. If you don't care about fuel consumption and maintenance, Hoshikoshi L is a good choice.

Is the 1.5T new Sagitar worth waiting, or is it more cost-effective to start with 1.4T?

Big brother, talk about the Veranda this car, recently considered it, more discounts, the lowest equipped with a car.

A-Toyota brand blessing, word of mouth and powertrain is more reliable, is The advantage of Velanda. However, there are also many disadvantages, such as rough interior, completely unlike the interior of a 200,000-priced car, and the configuration of low-end models is relatively low, so the cost performance is not high. Velanda this car we still recommend the 2.5L hybrid version, first of all, the 2.0L fuel version is OK, but the high-speed re-acceleration ability is relatively weak, and the 2.5L is not only much better in power, but also better in terms of silence and fuel economy.

Q&A column is updated every working day, everyone has any questions about the car can be left below the column to ask questions (not the dialog box of the public number Ha, easy to leak), we will arrange the answer in order, no answer to please be patient, sometimes more questions will be ranked to the second or third day, keep an eye on it ~

Read on