In fact, I don't have a personal opinion on Dr. Cai Zi, from the perspective of some of Dr. Cai Zi's knowledge transmission, it is actually a good point of view, I just said that Dr. Cai Zi lacked correct views in some of his views

In fact, I do not have personal opinions about Dr. Cai Zi, from the perspective of some of Dr. Cai Zi's knowledge transmission, it is actually a good point of view, I just said different views on the lack of correct views in some of Dr. Cai Zi's views, I hope that @ Dr. Cai Zi said that the United States can understand, so that it is the attitude that an open-minded person should have.

Once again, I would like to say something to Dr. Cai Zi:

First, China is a country of single nationality, not a country of immigration, which is the result of major national considerations, and also represents the opinions of the vast number of Chinese people. Therefore, I hope that Dr. Cai Zi will not stand in his own point of view and say yes, in general, people who agree with dual citizenship are basically speculators without exception;

Second, do not over-consume Gu Ailing, naturalization or recognition, generally have a position and a choice, of course, there is also a relationship of interests. Digging up people's education, digging up people's family situations, digging up views that people don't want to say, this is harmful to people's families. In saying that people's backgrounds are indeed different from ordinary families, others can't learn, let alone what kind of educational environment people are, can we know? It is even more impossible to relate to the American way of education in a rigid way, which is not objective and ignorant. Ordinary people can still understand this, does Dr. Cai not feel cheap when he says this?

Third, Dr. Cai's understanding of happiness education is indeed different from others, and there is some truth in what he says, but it is only a point of view that is correct or not lies in understanding. My understanding is that happiness education or strict education is good, mainly in family situations, hobbies, self-discipline and other aspects. Rich people's children can have private tutoring, separate training, etc., which is already superior at the starting line, just like some people boast that American children are independent at the age of 18, the actual situation is that rich American children are not independent, on the contrary, some American rich children go to college Parents do not do less than Chinese parents. So relatively compared, who is the target of happiness education? The simplest example, you can interview Chinese and American college students, it can be said that Chinese college students basically know a lot of the world situation, not to mention China's human geography, etc., but if you interview American college students may not know the 56 states of the United States, the world map to them may not be able to understand several continents and oceans, do you believe it?

Therefore, when I say this, I am telling you that Dr. Cai Zi is right to publicize the truth of the United States, but Dr. Cai Zi's limitation is that he only sees that his class cannot see the lower and higher levels, and then uses his class to apply what the United States has, which is his non-objectivity. His remarks can be referenced, the quotation is useful on it, I am not aimed at @ Dr. Cai Zi said the United States, I hope to understand.