Some commentators always like to say that feudal dynasties are all one hill, but they are all class oppression. There's really nothing wrong with that. But the Ming Dynasty was still only class oppression, while the Qing Dynasty was in class

Some commentators always like to say that feudal dynasties are all one hill, but they are all class oppression.

There's really nothing wrong with that.

But the Ming Dynasty was still only class oppression, and the Qing Dynasty added another layer of national oppression to class oppression.

We can't ignore the extra national oppression because it's all class oppression, can we?

The account must be calculated clearly, can not be sloppy, people owe you fifteen thousand, you can not just ten thousand back, the remaining five thousand to save the province, right?

Let's talk about the wind evaluation of the Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty.

A few years ago, Mr. Chen Wutong wrote a book on the history of Popular Science and Ming, called "Ten Lectures on the History of Ming".

In the preface to the book, Mr. Chen specifically mentions a phenomenon:

Turn on the TV and reflect the history of the Ming Dynasty, either the monarch is brutal and faint, or the factory guards are rampant and domineering, and the sky is dark; the TV drama that reflects the history of the Qing Dynasty is either the monarch's wisdom and wisdom, or the ministers and workers are energetic and promising, and they are all bright and clean.

It can be seen that for a long time in the past, the Qing Dynasty was much better than the Ming Dynasty in the public's concept.

In the era when Qing Palace drama was popular, it was enough to praise Kang, Yong, and Qian, although they may have used too much force, but after all, these three people did have remarkable political achievements on their bodies.

But later, the direction of Qing Palace drama became more and more wrong.

For example, some TV dramas such as secret history have begun to dress up butchers such as Nurhaci and Dolgun, as well as Cixi, Puyi, Li Hongzhang, and the like, and the historical dramas have begun to be whitewashed, and even Duoduo, the culprit of the Ten Days of Yangzhou, has begun to save the Han people from the hands of the Ming Army.

That's a bit of an excess.

In contrast to the TV series with the background of the Ming Dynasty, the imperial court is almost not a decent existence, in terms of historical dramas, Hu Jun's version of "Zhu Yuanzhang" gives people a feeling of old soil and slag, and the domineering and magnificent "Kangxi Dynasty" is simply different from the cloud and mud.

And these dramas are also a bit excessively blackened for the Ming Dynasty, and some magic plots are elusive, such as Chen Baoguo's version of "Legendary Emperor Zhu Yuanzhang", which completely ugly Zhu Yuanzhang into a useless and only harmful big dimwit, so angry that I want to drag Zhu Yuanzhang out of the play and beat it.

Let's talk about another classic drama "Daming Dynasty", in which Jiajing is almost a complete villain role, as well as Tang Guoqiang's "Wanli First Auxiliary Zhang Juzheng", in order to create an image of a tragic character for Zhang Juzheng, the screenwriter directly arranged for Wanli to poison Teacher Zhang, so that Teacher Zhang died... At that time, I was still young, I hadn't read much, and for a long time I really thought that Zhang Juzheng had let Wanli kill me.

And what is the most incomprehensible operation?

It is you who tout the Great Qing to tout the Great Qing, but every Great Qing drama, when the Manchu Emperor's body is shocked and domineering, incidentally, it must degrade the Ming Dynasty.

For example, in the Yuzheng drama, Emperor Taiji's sentence "The Emperors of the Ming Dynasty are so faint", the Kangxi Emperor's sentence "The Great Qing is far better than daming" in the Ming Xiaoling, Yao Qisheng's sentence "Kangxi is far better than the Ming Taizu Wow", and Qianlong's sentence "What is this good meaning called Huaxia Orthodoxy?" Ji Xiaolanli Zhang Tielin's sentence "The Ming Dynasty and eunuchs rule the world, I rule the world with the readers", and even The Jin Yong drama Li Wei Xiaobao also said a sentence "There is no bad emperor in the Qing Dynasty, and there is no good emperor in the Ming Dynasty"... The list goes on and on.

It can be said that the Ming Dynasty is a target and has become a stepping stone to raise the value of the Qing Dynasty.

In the past few years, the phenomenon of "blowing up the black and clear" has become popular, which is undoubtedly an objective fact, and as for why, I do not know, nor do I want to speculate.

But some people have to turn a blind eye, insist that there is no existence, then it does not exist, you are happy.

And the bright fans who blow on the Internet are relatively restrained.

For example, the year before, there was a drama called "The Biography of the Female Doctor Ming Concubine", which awkwardly blew Ming Yingzong, and also slightly whitewashed Wang Zhen, it is reasonable to say that the ming emperor is catering to ming chui's mentality.

But what?

Ming fans quickly scolded this drama as a dog, saying that this drama whitewashed Ming Yingzong, smeared Ming Mingzong, and even openly made trouble in the tieba passed down by the female doctor Ming Fei, causing the owner of the bar to post forbiding talk about any historical issues.

Look at the Qing Dynasty.

In addition to Tongzhi, other Qing emperors and even Puyi were washed in vain by the TV series.

Even Cixi whitened my mother.

In this regard, I have also seen a spiritual Manchurian nobleman say that the blow is not strong enough.

Let's talk about historians such as Li Zhiting and Ma Dazheng who openly whitewashed the souls of people such as Shang Kexi, Hong Chengzuo, and Wu Sangui, who even the Qing court was disgusted with.

What is this called?

Mr. Fang Zhiyuan once mentioned that there is a bad habit in the field of historiography to infinitely elevate the objects of his research, especially in Qing history, for example, the "prosperous life of Kangqian" is directly linked to the rice bowl, which is reflected in Yao Nianci's complaint:

However, the "prosperous" trend in the study of Qing history is indeed closely related to the survival of research institutions. As we all know, most of the current academic research is included in the various project plans of the state and institutions at all levels, so as to receive scientific research grants and corresponding awards. Whether or not they can obtain scientific research grants and awards is the "lifeline" of whether university teachers and researchers can stand on the society. At present, the large-scale revision of the history of the Qing Dynasty, which has not yet been completed, is positioned as a state-level academic project, which obviously has the flavor of "quasi-official repair", and the amount of government funding and the number of manpower collected are not only unprecedented, but also will be unprecedented. Of all the dynasties in China, the Qing Dynasty has the closest relationship with reality, and the importance of what status the Qing Dynasty has been given is self-evident. The presiding officer of this project naturally became the greatest of the "prosperous worlds" of the past. "The wind on the grass will blow", and the wind will reach and be invincible. The Qing Dynasty's "Kangqian Prosperous Era" became the longest and most accomplished tone in history, and it was set for one statue.