Regarding Tesla Motors, I originally did not plan to comment on it again, but I saw "Why can't we find a domestic new energy vehicle to replace Tesla 3 within 240,000-300,000?" The question was asked, and I couldn't help but think about it.
In December 2021, Tesla Model 3 sold 30,289 vehicles, Model Y sold 40,058 vehicles; from January to December, the cumulative sales of 272972 and 200131 vehicles were sold, and the domestic new energy vehicle market of more than 100,000 yuan was riding dust, and the new forces that independent brands believed to be tall could not even eat dust.
Follow us to learn more
Text/Second Brother
Produced by Governor Hiromon Studio
It is not that there is none, but it should have existed, but because the "ambitions" of independent brands, including BYD and some other new car-making forces, the road is crooked and there is no more.
No matter how many shameful water troops and ignorant xiaobai are not accustomed to Tesla, it is difficult to hide the unmatched advantages of its car-making concept and vehicle technology in the "new energy" automobile market.
Tesla Model 3
From the concept point of view, Tesla Motors' simple vision of "changing the world to a traffic lifestyle" makes many independent brand electric vehicle manufacturers who always feel that they are "the first in the world" and attack each other, slander each other, and hurt each other.
The test drive time has commented more than once, And Comrade Musk has never preached that Tesla cars are luxury brands, nor has he ever preached that Tesla is a new energy vehicle, and he has never preached that he wants to revolutionize the life of fuel vehicles and crush any competitor.
Not only that, with the cost reduction brought about by automation, scale, local production and online marketing, Tesla Motors continues to reduce prices to benefit consumers.
What is even more valuable is that Musk also disclosed the technical patents of Tesla Motors, making it a shared resource in the world and inspiring self-continuous research and development to stay ahead.
Beiqi Polar Fox Alpha S
Looking back at the domestic independent brands, the sales volume is better to call itself the leader of new energy vehicles, the price is higher than BBA, do not dare to cut the price to say not to cut leeks, sell an empty shell without batteries to say that the purchase of a car is immediately reduced by 128,000; in order to extend the mileage, either desperately stack the battery block, or add a set of engines and generators to be known as DM-i, extended range electric vehicles.
At the same time, in order to show the illusory "aura", independent brands blindly seek high and large configuration.
However, the reason why new energy is "new energy" is because it is saddled with energy-saving and environmental protection social attributes, and BYD Tang DM-i, Ideal ONE, Xiaopeng P7, Weilai ES8, Extreme Kr 001, and the Cyrus Q&C M5 that went viral in the media a few days ago, one is bigger than one, one is heavier than one, how do they save energy? How to be environmentally friendly?
From the perspective of pattern and concept, the so-called "new energy vehicles" of independent brands really cannot reach the height of Tesla vehicles, and from the perspective of mass production vehicle technology, it also reflects the insurmountable distance.
BYD Han EV
Don't say that the automatic assisted driving technology, with the perception level achieved by a single camera module to hang the domestic list of cameras, millimeter wave radar, lidar, ultrasonic radar and other sensors of the "smart" electric vehicle; the bydir Han EV, BAIC Polar Fox Alpha S, ideal ONE and other models of energy consumption are Tesla Model 3, Model Y 1.2 times, 1.5 times is enough to confirm how many roads we still need to catch up.
It is true that Tesla's quality control may not be excellent, and there is no shortage of accident cases, but these are not the root of the problem. What we have to do is to draw on the strengths of Tesla motors.
If the independent brand new energy vehicles have a high quality basis, less pompous and more pragmatic, do not bottomlessly try to earn ZF subsidies, while doubling the surface of the attractive fancy configuration to earn consumers' hard-earned money and disguise that it is responsible for consumers.
Build cars in a down-to-earth manner, build good cars, and build good cars that the people can afford to afford to lose, I believe that replacing Tesla is just around the corner.
If the mind is not right, there is no possibility.