Wen 丨 Cao Jingming
Title 丨Zhu Ziqing's "Back Shadow" Instigates Students to Commit Crimes? Professor: Textbooks should be removed! Do you agree?
Welcome to leave comments and exchange views on "Back Shadow"!
In the previous article, the author shared with you the views of the famous poet Xi Murong on the classic ancient text "Yugong Moving Mountains", saying that the content of this ancient text is really too terrible, and quickly moved out of the textbook.
Coincidentally, on similar issues, the famous writer Zhu Ziqing's "Back Shadow", which has touched countless people, has also faced this dilemma. Then, in this article, the author will share with you what is going on.
When it comes to Zhu Ziqing's "Back Shadow", what is the first thing that everyone thinks of? At least for the vast majority of melon-eating masses, the first thing that comes to mind should be the "famous scene" inside, which is also the most sincere "sending oranges" fragment of lyricism.
I saw him wearing a small black cloth hat, a black cloth coat, and a dark green cotton robe, and he staggered to the side of the railway and slowly leaned down, it was not too difficult. But he crossed the railway track, and it was not easy to climb the platform over there. He climbed up with both hands and shrank his feet upwards; his fat body leaned slightly to the left, showing the appearance of effort...
I remember that when I was in school, I deliberately wrote down this content and used it as material for future writing essays.
To put it bluntly, it is reserved for imitation. It can be seen how classic, touching, and impressive this content is, and it can be said that it is a "famous scene" in modern prose.
It is precisely because this "famous scene" is really too impressive, which has also attracted a lot of criticism and criticism by some experts and professors.
Professor Ding Qijin of the Department of Chinese of the University of Foreign Chinese in Beijing believes that Zhu Ziqing's "Back Shadow", especially the famous scene of "father climbing over the railway station fence", is suspected of instigating students to commit crimes, because the essence of this behavior is to violate traffic rules, and if students are proud of it and follow suit, it is easy to be dangerous, and the consequences are simply unimaginable.
What does this mean? Zhu Ziqing's father violated traffic rules, if you start from the perspective of current traffic safety, it is indeed undeniable, but this article, what is this paragraph trying to express? Is it to instigate the reader to climb over the fence of the train station as well? If Professor Ruo Ding Qijin can really only understand this point from this article, the author has nothing to say.
But then again, after the author has learned about Professor Ding Qijin's academic background, it is not surprising that he would put forward this shocking point of view. Because in Professor Ding Qijin's personal introduction, he has introduced his own experience as a visiting professor at Sungyeongsung Women's University in Seoul (Seoul) in South Korea and Daidong Bunka University in Tokyo, Japan.
Compared with other experts and professors who have had similar experiences, such as Professor Kong Kyung-dong of the Department of Chinese of Peking University, who also taught at Ewha Women's University in South Korea for 2 years, he also publicly expressed the view that "eating Chinese New Year's Eve meal is a barbaric and backward custom, Western countries do not eat it, and it should be abolished by legislation"...
According to the above phenomenon, it is difficult not to let the author wonder whether these expert professors ate too much kimchi during their teaching in Korea!
Otherwise, how could so many shocking points be made? Many times, when everyone criticizes some cows, ghosts and snake gods, we can't simply start from the current work experience, and combine it with other study abroad or work experience to analyze whether it is the US dollars, won, yen and the like, such as the cultural celebrities Jiang Fangzhou, Xiong Peiyun, He Weifang and others who broke out some time ago and received Japanese salaries.
Inheriting the above, Professor Ding Qijin's point of view is a typical "waste of food due to choking" in the author's opinion.
Some melon-eating masses said that in Zhu Ziqing's time, there were no traffic rules? Therefore, Zhu Ziqing's father's behavior cannot be regarded as violating traffic rules! In fact, this point of view, the author personally does not quite agree, need to be dialectical analysis, view.
Because at that time, there was also a clear stipulation that it was not allowed to climb the fence of the railway station, but it was not implemented in place, resulting in this move being very popular.
But for what reason, Zhu Ziqing's father's behavior of climbing the fence of the railway station is definitely not worth advocating in essence. There is no need to forcibly wash the discussion, because the focus of this article is not at all whether Zhu Ziqing's father has violated the traffic rules, but Zhu Ziqing's father's wordless, sincere, and hot fatherly love.
When you interpret an article, the most important thing should be to understand the author's creative intentions and what you really want to express, rather than using a magnifying glass to pick flaws.
A similar situation also occurred in Xi Murong, mentioned at the beginning of the article, who believes that "Yugong Moving Mountains" expresses the destruction of the natural environment by the Yugong family, which is directly equated with illegal mining. It is true that from Xi Murong's point of view, to interpret "Yugong Moving Mountains" is indeed such a problem. But the author believes that when any person with a normal mind reads this ancient text, what he feels should be a spirit of perseverance after selecting a goal, rather than some damage to the natural environment. This is completely contrary to the core of the text.
If Professor Ding Qijin links Zhu Ziqing's "Back Shadow" with instigating students to commit crimes, it can only be said that this person's vision and thinking are too dark, and he cannot see the good of others, nor can he understand the truth, goodness and beauty of the world.
Such a point of view, to be honest, there is no way to refute it, it can only be said to be a matter of values. In Professor Ding Qijin's values, Zhu Ziqing's father violated the traffic rules, and it was useless for anyone to refute this. Because facts are facts, but when reading this article, if you stare at this point, then you will never be able to understand this wordless father's love.
1) Xi Murong: "The Fool Moves the Mountain" is terrible, and should be removed from the textbook, what is her reason?
2) Wang Shuo commented on Yu Qiuyu: Qiong Yao under the guise of culture, low-end version of Xi Murong! Does it make sense?
3) Gu Long: Jin Yong novels are imitations! Expert: Self-plagiarism, backwards in writing! Makes sense
4) Why did Li Ao scold Fan Zeng for his poor character? The work does not deserve fame! Expert: Be tolerant of artists
5) Wang Shuo commented on Lao She's martyrdom with death: I do not agree with Lu Xun Mao Dun's point of view, and I also face the defects of his works
This article is [Cao Jingming] original, picture source network! #Brick Home ##教授 #