laitimes

Fuel saving does not save money, why add 20,000 on the mix? Owner: Plus 30,000 is worth it!

Since the Toyota Corolla and Raling twin engines came out, pulling the price of oil-electric hybrid models to the same level of ordinary fuel compact cars, honda IMMD, Hyundai hybrid, BYD hybrids have sprung up. At present, the fuel-electric hybrid model is about 20,000 yuan more expensive than the ordinary fuel version, considering the drivability and the improvement of the fuel vehicle, the hybrid car should be worth buying, but there are also many people who think that the hybrid car is fuel-saving and does not save money, what is the truth?

Fuel saving does not save money, why add 20,000 on the mix? Owner: Plus 30,000 is worth it!

For this reason, we take the Accord as an example, calculate whether it is cost-effective to buy a hybrid model, is it really fuel-saving and not cost-effective in the mouth of many netizens?

The comparison model is the accord hybrid minimum match is the Ruiku version, the official guidance price is 199,800 yuan, the fuel version of the minimum configuration is 230TURBO comfort version of the country SIX (comfort version without the country six), the official guidance price is 179,800 yuan, the difference is exactly 20,000 yuan.

Many people always ignore the configuration when comparing the hybrid version and the fuel version, is the configuration not worth it? So what is the significance of the existence of high-end models? Also the lowest-end, hybrid version of the model has more Honda SENSING system than the fuel version, including lane keeping, active braking, adaptive cruise, fatigue driving tips, etc., in addition to 7-inch LCD instrumentation, adaptive far and near light, automatic headlights, headlights delayed off, less power sunroof, imitation leather seats. With all due respect, the active security system alone is enough to pay back the difference, and the hybrid system is free of charge.

Fuel saving does not save money, why add 20,000 on the mix? Owner: Plus 30,000 is worth it!

However, every time I compare hybrid models, the bar fine is more, saying that I can't use these configurations, so we will temporarily ignore the configuration to talk about fuel consumption. We don't look at the happy fuel consumption of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, but directly look at the fuel consumption of car owners. According to the big data of Bear's fuel consumption, the comprehensive fuel consumption of the hybrid Ruiku version is 5.3 liters / 100 km, and the comprehensive fuel consumption of the fuel comfort version is 7.8 liters / 100 km, and the fuel consumption gap is about 2.5 liters. According to the oil price of 6.7 yuan per liter, it takes 8 years to save the difference, which is why many people say that hybrid fuel saving does not save money. Their reason is that it took 8 years to save fuel consumption, and when you bought a used car, you lost it, and you changed the car in 8 years, what Accord hybrid you bought, bought Fit, that preservation. Or that eight years to change the battery, then not only do not save money, but also lose money. Where did you learn that the hybrid car changed the battery in eight years? Honda official to the Accord hybrid version of the battery proposed a 10-year 200,000-kilometer warranty, 10 is not larger than 8? And this is not the battery of your home appliance bottle car, the hybrid battery is shallow and shallow, and the general life expectancy is more than 10 years without problems.

And please note that the difference in fuel consumption is the comprehensive fuel consumption, if you drive more in the city, the fuel version fuel consumption is far more than 7.8 liters, and the hybrid car does not open the air conditioning case, the more blocked the province, even if the air conditioner is more fuel-efficient than the fuel car, that is to say, it may be 2-3 years to save the difference back.

Fuel saving does not save money, why add 20,000 on the mix? Owner: Plus 30,000 is worth it!

If you don't care about fuel consumption, because you can't drive many kilometers a year, what about the improvement in driving experience brought by hybrid vehicles? I think that's the biggest value of the hybrid, and if you don't believe it, you can try it.

1. Comparable to the power response of large displacement self-priming

Why do I recommend urban commuters to buy hybrid models? Because at low and medium speeds, it can bring you a similar driving feeling to large-displacement self-priming cars, with power and excellent ride.

2, better car experience

In the case of sufficient power, accord hybrid can achieve pure electric driving of up to 80km/h, which means that in the case of medium and low speed, this car has no engine noise when driving pure electricity. And urban commuting often encounters traffic jams, at this time the superiority of oil-electricity hybrids is immediately highlighted, not afraid of traffic jams fuel consumption surge. And without starting the engine, you can comfortably blow the air conditioner.

3, a larger driving radius

The Accord Hybrid tank can easily travel up to 1000km, which can greatly reduce the number of times you detour to the gas station and save the owner's time.

Fuel saving does not save money, why add 20,000 on the mix? Owner: Plus 30,000 is worth it!

Finally, I know that many people only talk about economy when talking about hybrid, but the higher configuration of hybrid models and better driving experience cannot be ignored, and should also be taken into account when measuring cost performance. Even if you only calculate the economic account, if you are commuting more in the city, it is well worth buying a hybrid. If you travel at high speed, or want to change cars in a few years, or don't care about driving experience at all, please choose hybrid cars carefully.

Read on